Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Kumho Crugen HP91 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho Crugen HP91

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Kumho Crugen HP91 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
71/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
78/100
21 owner reviews
Dry
85
Wet
87
Snow
–
Comfort
79
Noise
36
Treadwear
67
Handling
78

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Summer Premium Touring tires

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
12 owner reviews
Dry
78
Wet
57
Snow
60
Comfort
78
Noise
–
Treadwear
79
Handling
66

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Kumho Crugen HP91 — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Crugen HP91 leads by 7
A — Kumho Crugen HP91
85
B — Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
78
Why this score
SourceCrugen HP91Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Professional tests (TWG score) 82 –
Tyre Reviews owners 89 77

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Crugen HP91 leads by 30
A — Kumho Crugen HP91
87
B — Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
57
Why this score
SourceCrugen HP91Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Professional tests (TWG score) 88 –
Tyre Reviews owners 86 55

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Crugen HP91
–
B — Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
60

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Crugen HP91 leads by 1
A — Kumho Crugen HP91
79
B — Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
78
Why this score
SourceCrugen HP91Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Tyre Reviews owners 79 77

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Crugen HP91
36
B — Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
–
Why this score
SourceCrugen HP91Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Professional tests (TWG score) 36 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Geolandar G055 Blue Earth leads by 12
A — Kumho Crugen HP91
67
B — Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
79
Why this score
SourceCrugen HP91Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Tyre Reviews owners 67 79

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Crugen HP91 leads by 12
A — Kumho Crugen HP91
78
B — Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
66
Why this score
SourceCrugen HP91Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Tyre Reviews owners 78 66
DriverReviews owners 82 –

Scores at a glance

Kumho Crugen HP91 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Crugen HP91Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Relative Score 79 71
Dry 85 78
Wet 87 57
Snow – 60
Comfort 79 78
Noise 36 –
Treadwear 67 79
Handling 78 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Crugen HP91

The Kumho Crugen HP91 is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that offers impressive wet and dry grip, often rivaling more expensive premium brands. While many users praise its comfort and handling, there is a notable polarization regarding tread longevity, with some owners reporting excellent mileage and others experiencing premature wear.

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry traction
  • High value-to-price ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Responsive handling and steering feedback

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life reported across different vehicles
  • Occasional reports of sidewall or structural integrity issues
  • Some users report a softer compound that wears faster than expected

Observations

  • Owners of larger SUVs like the Kia Sorento and Ford Kuga generally report high satisfaction with both longevity and performance.
  • Users driving on rougher road surfaces, such as those in South Africa or Ukraine, reported faster degradation or structural issues.
  • Some Hyundai Santa Fe owners noted dissatisfaction with wet-weather performance and rapid tread wear compared to other vehicle owners.
Tire B Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

The Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth receives a polarized reception, with users praising its exceptional cabin quietness, ride comfort, and improvements in fuel efficiency. However, these benefits are frequently overshadowed by significant concerns regarding wet-weather traction and inconsistent tread longevity across various SUV models.

Pros

  • Excellent cabin noise reduction and ride comfort
  • Noticeable improvement in fuel economy and rolling resistance
  • Strong performance on dry pavement
  • Reliable durability for moderate, daily commuting

Cons

  • Poor lateral grip and handling on wet surfaces
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Higher price point relative to performance consistency
  • Increased road noise as the tire ages

Observations

  • Users of midsize SUVs like the Honda CR-V reported high satisfaction with comfort and longevity.
  • Owners of heavier or more powerful vehicles, such as the Kia Sportage and Subaru Forester XT, reported faster-than-expected tread wear and compromised handling in adverse conditions.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HP91 B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG420 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Yokohama

Winner: Kumho Crugen HP91 — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HP91 scores 87 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Crugen HP91 scores 78 vs 66 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 79 vs 67 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Crugen HP91 scores 85 vs 78 on dry.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP91
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.