66
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
64/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Kumho KL33 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — better treadwear, dry and comfort. Pick the Kumho KL33 if wet matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | KL33 | Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 77 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
KL33 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | KL33 | Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 55 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | KL33 | Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 77 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | KL33 | Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 59 | 79 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | KL33 | Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 66 |
| DriverReviews owners | 84 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho KL33 | Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 71 |
| Dry | 73 | 78 |
| Wet | 65 | 57 |
| Snow | – | 60 |
| Comfort | 73 | 78 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 79 |
| Handling | 65 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
66
/ 100
Tire A
71
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho KL33 presents a polarizing ownership experience, often serving as an OEM choice that delivers competent dry-weather performance and comfort when new. However, the consensus is significantly marred by reports of premature tread degradation, including chunking and delamination, alongside inconsistent long-term durability and poor manufacturer warranty support.
Pros
- Strong initial dry traction and braking performance
- Competitive price point offering good value for money
- Generally comfortable and quiet ride quality when new
- Satisfactory handling characteristics for standard suburban driving
Cons
- Significant reports of tread block chipping, chunking, and premature wear
- Concerns regarding structural integrity and potential delamination
- Increased road noise as the tire reaches mid-life
- Unresponsive customer service regarding warranty claims
Observations
- Users on heavier SUVs and minivans like the Kia Carnival and Audi Q5 reported faster tread wear and lack of cornering feedback.
- Drivers of diesel-powered SUVs noted better longevity and satisfaction compared to those with gasoline-powered or luxury-segment vehicles.
The Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth receives a polarized reception, with users praising its exceptional cabin quietness, ride comfort, and improvements in fuel efficiency. However, these benefits are frequently overshadowed by significant concerns regarding wet-weather traction and inconsistent tread longevity across various SUV models.
Pros
- Excellent cabin noise reduction and ride comfort
- Noticeable improvement in fuel economy and rolling resistance
- Strong performance on dry pavement
- Reliable durability for moderate, daily commuting
Cons
- Poor lateral grip and handling on wet surfaces
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Higher price point relative to performance consistency
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
Observations
- Users of midsize SUVs like the Honda CR-V reported high satisfaction with comfort and longevity.
- Owners of heavier or more powerful vehicles, such as the Kia Sportage and Subaru Forester XT, reported faster-than-expected tread wear and compromised handling in adverse conditions.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho KL33 | B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
66
/ 100
Kumho
71
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — better treadwear, dry and comfort. Pick the Kumho KL33 if wet matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 79 vs 59 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho KL33 scores 65 vs 57 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 78 vs 73 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 78 vs 73 on comfort.
Tire A · Kumho KL33
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho KL33 also compared with
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.