82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
94/100
281 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Hankook Kinergy PT vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
69
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Kinergy PT — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth if snow matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Kinergy PT leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy PT | Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 77 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Kinergy PT leads by 36
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy PT | Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 55 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth leads by 50
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy PT | Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 10 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Kinergy PT leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy PT | Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 40 | 77 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Kinergy PT leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy PT | Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 10 | 79 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Kinergy PT leads by 28
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy PT | Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 66 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Kinergy PT | Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 69 |
| Dry | 95 | 78 |
| Wet | 93 | 57 |
| Snow | 10 | 60 |
| Comfort | 93 | 78 |
| Noise | 91 | – |
| Treadwear | 92 | 79 |
| Handling | 94 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
82
/ 100
Tire A
69
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Kinergy PT is widely regarded as a high-value, long-lasting all-season tire that offers a quiet and comfortable ride. While most users praise its wet and dry traction, opinions on its winter performance are polarized, and a small subset of users report premature wear or noise issues.
Pros
- Excellent tread life and high mileage warranty
- Quiet and smooth ride quality
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands like Michelin
- Reliable wet and dry pavement traction
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in deep snow or icy conditions
- Occasional reports of premature tread wear
- Some users report increased road noise over time
- Frustrating rebate fulfillment processes
Observations
- EV owners appreciate the tire's efficiency and quiet operation as a cost-effective alternative to OEM tires.
- SUV and crossover drivers generally report high satisfaction with the tire's stability and ride comfort.
- Some users suggest the tire's stiffer compound is better suited for larger vehicles than smaller, lighter passenger cars.
The Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth receives a polarized reception, with users praising its exceptional cabin quietness, ride comfort, and improvements in fuel efficiency. However, these benefits are frequently overshadowed by significant concerns regarding wet-weather traction and inconsistent tread longevity across various SUV models.
Pros
- Excellent cabin noise reduction and ride comfort
- Noticeable improvement in fuel economy and rolling resistance
- Strong performance on dry pavement
- Reliable durability for moderate, daily commuting
Cons
- Poor lateral grip and handling on wet surfaces
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Higher price point relative to performance consistency
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
Observations
- Users of midsize SUVs like the Honda CR-V reported high satisfaction with comfort and longevity.
- Owners of heavier or more powerful vehicles, such as the Kia Sportage and Subaru Forester XT, reported faster-than-expected tread wear and compromised handling in adverse conditions.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Kinergy PT | B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
82
/ 100
Hankook
69
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Hankook Kinergy PT — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth if snow matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 60 vs 10 on snow.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Kinergy PT scores 93 vs 57 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Kinergy PT scores 94 vs 66 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Kinergy PT scores 95 vs 78 on dry.
Tire A · Hankook Kinergy PT
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Kinergy PT also compared with
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.