83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
85/100
8 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Kumho Ecsta KU19 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
57 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho Ecsta KU19 — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KU19 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta KU19 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KU19 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta KU19 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 78 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KU19 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta KU19 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 86 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KU19 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta KU19 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 75 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KU19 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta KU19 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 81 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta KU19 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 80 |
| Dry | 85 | 83 |
| Wet | 81 | 78 |
| Comfort | 89 | 86 |
| Treadwear | 79 | 75 |
| Handling | 86 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Ecsta KU19 is highly regarded by performance-oriented drivers for its exceptional balance of wet and dry traction, often outperforming more expensive premium alternatives. Users consistently praise the tire for its quiet operation, predictable handling, and ability to manage high-torque applications without excessive wheel spin.
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry grip performance
- Superior noise suppression at highway speeds
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
- Improved ride compliance and road feedback
- Effective traction management for high-output vehicles
Cons
- Softer sidewall construction may not suit all driving styles
- Limited long-term tread life data available from current user reports
- Potential for inconsistent handling feel if mixed with stiffer-sidewall tires on the same axle
Observations
- Owners of high-torque vehicles, such as V8 Commodores and XR6 Turbos, report significant improvements in off-the-line traction and reduced wheel spin.
- Users transitioning from premium tires like the Bridgestone Potenza RE050A noted that the KU19 offers better stability on rough, uneven road surfaces by reducing tram-lining.
The Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented tire that excels in daily driving scenarios. While most users praise its quiet operation, smooth ride quality, and reliable dry-weather grip, consensus on wet-weather performance and tread longevity is mixed, with some users reporting significant performance degradation as the tire wears.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
- Noticeable improvement in fuel efficiency for many users
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
- Not intended for high-performance or aggressive driving
Observations
- Users of compact hatchbacks and city cars (e.g., Honda Jazz, Fiat 500) report high satisfaction with comfort and noise levels.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque engines occasionally report faster-than-expected front-tire wear.
- Some users noted that the tire requires a 'break-in' period of several hundred miles before reaching optimal performance.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta KU19 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
Kumho
80
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Kumho Ecsta KU19 — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Ecsta KU19 scores 86 vs 81 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Ecsta KU19 scores 79 vs 75 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Ecsta KU19 scores 81 vs 78 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Ecsta KU19 scores 89 vs 86 on comfort.
Tire A · Kumho Ecsta KU19
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Ecsta KU19 also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.