Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Turanza ER70 vs Kumho Ecsta PA51 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER70 | Ecsta PA51 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 69 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 75 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 98 |
| America's Tire owners | – | 94 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER70 | Ecsta PA51 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 85 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 58 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 98 |
| America's Tire owners | – | 89 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER70 | Ecsta PA51 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 74 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 63 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 60 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 88 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER70 | Ecsta PA51 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 23 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 63 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
| America's Tire owners | – | 92 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER70 | Ecsta PA51 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 96 |
| America's Tire owners | – | 89 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER70 | Ecsta PA51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 79 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 10 | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 94 |
| America's Tire owners | – | 90 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER70 | Ecsta PA51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 75 |
| America's Tire owners | – | 92 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER70 | Kumho Ecsta PA51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 81 |
| Dry | 90 | 79 |
| Wet | 70 | 86 |
| Snow | – | 76 |
| Comfort | 80 | 50 |
| Noise | – | 90 |
| Treadwear | 10 | 90 |
| Handling | 80 | 91 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Turanza ER70 receives a mixed reception, primarily due to significant concerns regarding premature tread wear. While the user has a history of brand loyalty to Bridgestone, the specific experience with this tire indicates a notable failure in longevity.
Cons
- Extremely short tread life
- Potential quality control inconsistencies
Observations
- The reported mileage of 7,800 miles suggests the tire may not meet expected durability standards for standard passenger vehicle usage.
The Kumho Ecsta PA51 is widely regarded as a high-value, ultra-high-performance all-season tire that delivers impressive dry grip and ride comfort at a competitive price point. While the vast majority of users report satisfaction with its handling and noise levels, a small minority of drivers find its wet-weather performance and noise characteristics lacking compared to premium-tier alternatives.
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Strong dry pavement traction and cornering grip
- Quiet and smooth ride quality
- Attractive sidewall aesthetics
- Consistent, even tread wear over long-term use
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in heavy rain or standing water
- Some reports of increased road noise over time
- Limited availability in certain niche sizes
- Occasional traction loss under hard acceleration
Observations
- Users with performance-oriented sedans (e.g., Acura TL, Infiniti G35x) report that the tire effectively manages power delivery and provides a significant upgrade over worn OEM tires.
- Owners of daily drivers and SUVs frequently praise the tire's longevity and comfort, noting it performs well for suburban and highway commuting.
- Some users noted that while the tire is excellent for general use, it may not meet the extreme performance expectations of high-horsepower sports cars compared to top-tier dedicated performance tires.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER70 | B · Kumho Ecsta PA51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | All Season Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 13 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10.5/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 45,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Kumho
Winner: Kumho Ecsta PA51 — better treadwear, wet and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Turanza ER70 if comfort and dry matter most to you.
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 90 vs 10 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Turanza ER70 scores 80 vs 50 on comfort.
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 86 vs 70 on wet.
Bridgestone Turanza ER70 scores 90 vs 79 on dry.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.