Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Nexen Winguard Sport — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Kumho Ecsta PS71 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
84/100
13 professional tests
User signal (40%)
77/100
84 owner reviews
Dry
81
Wet
83
Snow
–
Comfort
74
Noise
92
Treadwear
71
Handling
79

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Nexen

Nexen Winguard Sport

Winter Touring tires

Nexen Winguard Sport tread pattern
Objective (60%)
73/100
3 professional tests
User signal (40%)
84/100
46 owner reviews
Dry
87
Wet
75
Snow
84
Comfort
87
Noise
51
Treadwear
86
Handling
65

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Kumho Ecsta PS71 — better noise, handling and wet. Pick the Nexen Winguard Sport if treadwear, comfort and dry matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Winguard Sport leads by 6
A — Kumho Ecsta PS71
81
B — Nexen Winguard Sport
87
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS71Winguard Sport
Professional tests (TWG score) 79 86
Tyre Reviews owners 85 82
Dry Braking (% of best) 100% 95%
Dry Handling (% of best) 95% 99%

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS71 leads by 8
A — Kumho Ecsta PS71
83
B — Nexen Winguard Sport
75
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS71Winguard Sport
Professional tests (TWG score) 85 68
Tyre Reviews owners 80 79
Wet Braking (% of best) 94% 90%
Wet Handling (% of best) 92% 98%

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Ecsta PS71
–
B — Nexen Winguard Sport
84
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS71Winguard Sport
Professional tests (TWG score) – 80
Tyre Reviews owners – 90

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Winguard Sport leads by 13
A — Kumho Ecsta PS71
74
B — Nexen Winguard Sport
87
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS71Winguard Sport
Professional tests (TWG score) 74 –
Tyre Reviews owners 73 81

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS71 leads by 41
A — Kumho Ecsta PS71
92
B — Nexen Winguard Sport
51
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS71Winguard Sport
Professional tests (TWG score) 92 29

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Winguard Sport leads by 15
A — Kumho Ecsta PS71
71
B — Nexen Winguard Sport
86
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS71Winguard Sport
Tyre Reviews owners 71 85

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS71 leads by 14
A — Kumho Ecsta PS71
79
B — Nexen Winguard Sport
65
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS71Winguard Sport
Tyre Reviews owners 79 65
DriverReviews owners 82 –

Scores at a glance

Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Nexen Winguard Sport: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta PS71Nexen Winguard Sport
Relative Score 79 76
Dry 81 87
Wet 83 75
Snow – 84
Comfort 74 87
Noise 92 51
Treadwear 71 86
Handling 79 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Test data

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryTire ATire BΔBoth?
Dry Braking Dry 100% #1/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 95% #15/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test +5.5 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 95% #7/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 99% #7/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test -3.5 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 83% #15/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test 71% #18/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test +11.9 Different tests
Noise Other 100% #17/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 95% #1/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test +4.9 Different tests
Price Other 62% #4/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 62% #2/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test -0.5 Different tests
Value Other 98% #19/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 63% #4/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test +35.8 Different tests
Wear Other 49% #20/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 73% #18/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test -23.7 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 14% #7/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 7% #15/56 · 2022 Winter Tyre Market Overview +7.6 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 100% #1/10 · 2022 Tyre Reviews UUHP Summer Tyre Test 92% #16/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test +7.5 Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Total 0% #20/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0% #13/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 0 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 94% #5/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 90% #17/56 · 2022 Winter Tyre Market Overview +3.7 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 92% #7/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 98% #10/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test -5.6 Different tests
From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Ecsta PS71

The Kumho Ecsta PS71 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range performance tire that offers impressive wet and dry grip, often rivaling more expensive premium brands. While most users praise its handling and affordability, a subset of owners reports significant issues with road noise, inconsistent manufacturing quality, and occasional balancing difficulties.

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry traction
  • High value-for-money proposition
  • Predictable handling and cornering feedback
  • Strong aquaplaning resistance

Cons

  • Reports of road noise and droning at highway speeds
  • Inconsistent manufacturing quality (balancing issues and 'egg-shaped' tires)
  • Soft sidewall construction leading to a 'floaty' or unstable feel for some drivers
  • Variable tread life depending on vehicle type and driving style

Observations

  • Users with high-torque RWD vehicles (e.g., BMW, Jaguar) generally report high satisfaction with grip levels, though some note faster rear-tire wear.
  • Owners of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., MX-5) occasionally report a 'floaty' sensation due to tread block movement, which can be unsettling during spirited driving.
  • Some users on larger rim sizes (19-20 inch) report increased road noise and sensitivity to road imperfections.
Tire B Nexen Winguard Sport

The Nexen Winguard Sport is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that offers impressive traction in snow and slush for its price point. While most users praise its comfort, low noise levels, and reliable cold-weather performance, a minority of drivers report inconsistent grip in wet or icy conditions compared to premium alternatives.

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium winter tire brands
  • Strong traction and confidence in snow and slush
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Good durability and tread life for a mid-range tire

Cons

  • Inconsistent performance in wet or icy conditions for some users
  • Potential for uneven tread wear
  • Reported decrease in fuel economy for some vehicles
  • Not intended for high-performance dry-weather driving

Observations

  • BMW and Audi owners frequently report that the tires significantly improve winter capability on RWD and FWD platforms, often comparing them favorably to more expensive brands like Blizzaks.
  • Users with performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., VW GTI, Subaru WRX) note a marked improvement in winter safety over stock summer tires, though some report understeer during spirited dry-weather driving.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Mixed

Community discussions regarding the Kumho Ecsta PS71 generally present it as a solid, budget-friendly ultra-high-performance (UHP) summer tire offering good value, though opinions on its limits vary. Some users praise its handling transformations and decent wet/dry grip for spirited driving, while others note it feels merely adequate or mediocre until warmed up, preferring premium alternatives when budget permits.

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Value for money#Tire wear and longevity#UHP performance characteristics#Comparison with premium brands#Sidewall width and markings#Tire pressure management

Based on 19 community posts

Tire B

Nexen Winguard Sport

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PS71 B · Nexen Winguard Sport
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresWinter Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
SidewallBlackwall—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Nexen

Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS71 — better noise, handling and wet. Pick the Nexen Winguard Sport if treadwear, comfort and dry matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 92 vs 51 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen Winguard Sport scores 86 vs 71 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 79 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen Winguard Sport scores 87 vs 74 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS71
Tire B · Nexen Winguard Sport

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.