81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Kumho Ecsta Seven KU23 vs Nexen N Fera SU4 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
94 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better handling, dry and comfort. Pick the Kumho Ecsta Seven KU23 if wet matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta Seven KU23 | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 91 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ecsta Seven KU23 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta Seven KU23 | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 87 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta Seven KU23 | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 87 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta Seven KU23 | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 81 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta Seven KU23 | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta Seven KU23 | Nexen N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 85 |
| Dry | 82 | 91 |
| Wet | 90 | 87 |
| Snow | – | 76 |
| Comfort | 84 | 88 |
| Noise | – | 91 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 82 |
| Handling | 64 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
81
/ 100
Tire A
85
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Ecsta Seven KU23 is generally regarded as a high-value tire that balances affordability with respectable performance. While user experiences regarding tread longevity vary significantly, most owners appreciate the tire's wet-weather capabilities and aggressive tread design relative to its competitive price point.
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Reliable wet-weather traction
- Consistent and even tread wear patterns
- Aggressive, functional tread design
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life expectations
- Potential for faster wear compared to premium-tier competitors
- Limited long-term durability data
Observations
- Users running low-profile 40-series tires reported achieving over 40,000 kilometers with even wear.
- Initial tread depth measurements suggest a potential lifespan of approximately 17,000 miles under spirited driving conditions.
The Nexen N Fera SU4 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly summer tire that punches well above its price point. Users consistently praise its impressive wet and dry traction, low noise levels, and superior ride comfort compared to more expensive premium brands. While it is not a dedicated track tire, it serves as an excellent daily driver option for those seeking a balance of performance and economy.
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong, predictable grip in both wet and dry conditions
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Good longevity for daily commuting and highway driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a lack of precision during aggressive cornering
- Performance significantly degrades in near-freezing or snowy conditions
- Occasional reports of sidewall bulges or premature wear under heavy use
- Not suitable for high-performance track applications
Observations
- Drivers of heavy vehicles or hot hatches noted that the soft sidewalls can cause a 'rolling' sensation during spirited cornering.
- Users on luxury sedans (e.g., Lexus, Audi) frequently highlighted the tire's ability to significantly reduce road noise and improve ride quality over stock premium tires.
- Some owners of high-torque vehicles reported faster tread wear on the front axle compared to lighter, standard passenger cars.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta Seven KU23 | B · Nexen N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
81
/ 100
Kumho
85
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better handling, dry and comfort. Pick the Kumho Ecsta Seven KU23 if wet matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 80 vs 64 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 91 vs 82 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 88 vs 84 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Ecsta Seven KU23 scores 90 vs 87 on wet.
Tire A · Kumho Ecsta Seven KU23
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU4
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Ecsta Seven KU23 also compared with
Nexen N Fera SU4 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.