73
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
74/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Kumho Ecsta X3 KL17 ASYMMETRIC vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
57 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling and comfort. Pick the Kumho Ecsta X3 KL17 ASYMMETRIC if dry matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ecsta X3 KL17 ASYMMETRIC leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta X3 KL17 ASYMMETRIC | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ecsta X3 KL17 ASYMMETRIC leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta X3 KL17 ASYMMETRIC | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 78 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta X3 KL17 ASYMMETRIC | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 86 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta X3 KL17 ASYMMETRIC | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 75 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 46
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta X3 KL17 ASYMMETRIC | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 35 | 81 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta X3 KL17 ASYMMETRIC | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 81 |
| Dry | 95 | 83 |
| Wet | 80 | 78 |
| Comfort | 75 | 86 |
| Treadwear | – | 75 |
| Handling | 35 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
Tire A
81
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Ecsta X3 KL17 Asymmetric is generally regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly tire that offers responsive handling and solid dry-weather performance. While it provides a noticeable upgrade in steering feel compared to some legacy tires, users report compromises in cabin noise and limited traction in severe winter conditions.
Pros
- High value for the price point
- Responsive steering and handling characteristics
- Reliable performance in warm, dry weather conditions
Cons
- Increased road noise on uneven or bumpy surfaces
- Limited grip on ice and steep, icy inclines
- Occasional traction loss in snow
Observations
- Users transitioning from legacy tires on older luxury SUVs (such as the Range Rover P38) noted improved responsiveness.
- Performance is perceived as adequate for light winter conditions but lacks the specialized grip required for severe ice.
The Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented tire that excels in daily driving scenarios. While most users praise its quiet operation, smooth ride quality, and reliable dry-weather grip, consensus on wet-weather performance and tread longevity is mixed, with some users reporting significant performance degradation as the tire wears.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
- Noticeable improvement in fuel efficiency for many users
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
- Not intended for high-performance or aggressive driving
Observations
- Users of compact hatchbacks and city cars (e.g., Honda Jazz, Fiat 500) report high satisfaction with comfort and noise levels.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque engines occasionally report faster-than-expected front-tire wear.
- Some users noted that the tire requires a 'break-in' period of several hundred miles before reaching optimal performance.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta X3 KL17 ASYMMETRIC | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
Kumho
81
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling and comfort. Pick the Kumho Ecsta X3 KL17 ASYMMETRIC if dry matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 81 vs 35 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Ecsta X3 KL17 ASYMMETRIC scores 95 vs 83 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 86 vs 75 on comfort.
Tire A · Kumho Ecsta X3 KL17 ASYMMETRIC
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Ecsta X3 KL17 ASYMMETRIC also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.