Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Kumho KL33 vs Nexen WinGuard — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho KL33

Summer Premium Touring tires

Kumho KL33 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
64/100
9 owner reviews
Dry
73
Wet
65
Snow
–
Comfort
73
Treadwear
59
Handling
65

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Nexen

Nexen WinGuard

Winter Touring tires

Nexen WinGuard tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
73/100
6 owner reviews
Dry
67
Wet
65
Snow
100
Comfort
72
Treadwear
80
Handling
60

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Nexen WinGuard — better treadwear. Pick the Kumho KL33 if dry and handling matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) KL33 leads by 6
A — Kumho KL33
73
B — Nexen WinGuard
67
Why this score
SourceKL33WinGuard
Tyre Reviews owners 73 67

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho KL33
65
B — Nexen WinGuard
65
Why this score
SourceKL33WinGuard
Tyre Reviews owners 65 65

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho KL33
–
B — Nexen WinGuard
100
Why this score
SourceKL33WinGuard
Tyre Reviews owners – 100

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) KL33 leads by 1
A — Kumho KL33
73
B — Nexen WinGuard
72
Why this score
SourceKL33WinGuard
Tyre Reviews owners 73 72

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) WinGuard leads by 21
A — Kumho KL33
59
B — Nexen WinGuard
80
Why this score
SourceKL33WinGuard
Tyre Reviews owners 59 80

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) KL33 leads by 5
A — Kumho KL33
65
B — Nexen WinGuard
60
Why this score
SourceKL33WinGuard
Tyre Reviews owners 65 60
DriverReviews owners 84 –

Scores at a glance

Kumho KL33 vs Nexen WinGuard: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho KL33Nexen WinGuard
Relative Score 66 70
Dry 73 67
Wet 65 65
Snow – 100
Comfort 73 72
Treadwear 59 80
Handling 65 60

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho KL33

The Kumho KL33 presents a polarizing ownership experience, often serving as an OEM choice that delivers competent dry-weather performance and comfort when new. However, the consensus is significantly marred by reports of premature tread degradation, including chunking and delamination, alongside inconsistent long-term durability and poor manufacturer warranty support.

Pros

  • Strong initial dry traction and braking performance
  • Competitive price point offering good value for money
  • Generally comfortable and quiet ride quality when new
  • Satisfactory handling characteristics for standard suburban driving

Cons

  • Significant reports of tread block chipping, chunking, and premature wear
  • Concerns regarding structural integrity and potential delamination
  • Increased road noise as the tire reaches mid-life
  • Unresponsive customer service regarding warranty claims

Observations

  • Users on heavier SUVs and minivans like the Kia Carnival and Audi Q5 reported faster tread wear and lack of cornering feedback.
  • Drivers of diesel-powered SUVs noted better longevity and satisfaction compared to those with gasoline-powered or luxury-segment vehicles.
Tire B Nexen WinGuard

The Nexen WinGuard is generally regarded as a capable budget-friendly winter tire that provides a significant performance upgrade over summer tires in cold and snowy conditions. While most users report reliable traction and confidence-inspiring handling in winter environments, some reviewers note that its performance on ice and in warmer temperatures is limited compared to premium alternatives.

Pros

  • Strong traction and handling in snow-covered conditions
  • Noticeable improvement in grip over summer tires in cold weather
  • Confidence-inspiring braking performance on mountain passes
  • High value-for-money proposition

Cons

  • Mediocre performance on ice
  • Poor dry-weather handling when temperatures exceed 10°C
  • Occasional difficulty with uphill starts in deep snow

Observations

  • Users report that the tire performs best when temperatures remain consistently below 4°C.
  • Performance is noted to be highly effective for mountain driving and steep inclines, though traction can be inconsistent during initial acceleration from a standstill.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho KL33 B · Nexen WinGuard
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresWinter Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Nexen

Winner: Nexen WinGuard — better treadwear. Pick the Kumho KL33 if dry and handling matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen WinGuard scores 80 vs 59 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho KL33 scores 73 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho KL33 scores 65 vs 60 on handling.

Tire A · Kumho KL33
Tire B · Nexen WinGuard

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.