79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
84 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 vs Kumho Road Venture 798 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
91
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
71 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho Road Venture 798 — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Road Venture 798 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | Road Venture 798 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 75 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Road Venture 798 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | Road Venture 798 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 63 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Road Venture 798 leads by 12
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Road Venture 798 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | Road Venture 798 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 70 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Road Venture 798 leads by 12
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Road Venture 798 leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | Road Venture 798 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 57 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 85 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Road Venture 798 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | Road Venture 798 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 53 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 | Kumho Road Venture 798 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 91 |
| Dry | 86 | 95 |
| Wet | 84 | 89 |
| Snow | 80 | 92 |
| Comfort | 79 | 92 |
| Noise | 80 | 92 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 92 |
| Handling | 74 | 89 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
79
/ 100
Tire A
91
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfortable summer tire that excels in wet and dry traction, often serving as a competent OEM choice for premium vehicles. While many users praise its ride quality and wet-weather confidence, a significant portion of enthusiasts note a lack of steering feedback and 'soft' sidewall characteristics that can make the handling feel less precise compared to top-tier competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport series.
Pros
- Excellent wet-weather grip and hydroplaning resistance
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry-road traction and predictable handling at the limit
- Competitive pricing relative to premium performance alternatives
- Good overall durability for many daily driving applications
Cons
- Lack of steering precision and 'numb' road feedback
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a wobbly or unstable feel during aggressive cornering
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear on specific vehicle platforms
- Occasional reports of sidewall bubbling or structural issues on rough road surfaces
Observations
- Users with heavy EVs and SUVs often report mixed results, with some praising the low rolling resistance and comfort, while others note rapid tread wear.
- Drivers of performance-oriented sedans (e.g., BMW 3-series, Audi S3) frequently highlight the tire's comfort advantage over competitors but criticize the lack of sharp steering response.
- The tire is frequently noted as a significant upgrade over stock Pirelli P Zero or Dunlop Sport Maxx tires in terms of wet-weather confidence and noise reduction.
The Kumho Road Venture 798 is widely regarded as a high-value, all-terrain tire that punches above its price point, particularly regarding road noise and ride comfort. While most users praise its performance across various surfaces, including snow and light off-road terrain, a minority of owners report issues with ride quality and uneven wear patterns.
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price point
- Surprisingly low road noise for an all-terrain/aggressive tread design
- Strong dry pavement traction and handling
- Good longevity and tread wear performance for many users
- Aesthetically pleasing, aggressive sidewall design
Cons
- Reports of uneven wear or cupping over time
- Some users experience vibration or bouncing issues on heavier trucks
- Wet weather traction can be inconsistent depending on road surface
- Occasional reports of slow air pressure loss
Observations
- Owners of heavy-duty trucks (e.g., RAM 2500) reported more significant ride quality issues, such as shaking or bouncing, compared to SUV owners.
- Users on smaller SUVs and crossovers (e.g., Hyundai Santa Fe) frequently report high satisfaction with longevity and comfort, often comparing them favorably to premium brands like Michelin.
- The tire is noted for being a quiet alternative to more aggressive mud-terrain tires on vehicles like the Jeep Wrangler and FJ Cruiser.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 | B · Kumho Road Venture 798 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Max Performance Summer tire | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
79
/ 100
Hankook
91
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Kumho Road Venture 798 — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Road Venture 798 scores 92 vs 71 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Road Venture 798 scores 89 vs 74 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Road Venture 798 scores 92 vs 79 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Kumho Road Venture 798 scores 92 vs 80 on snow.
Tire A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Tire B · Kumho Road Venture 798
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 also compared with
Kumho Road Venture 798 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.