Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Kumho Road Venture 798 vs Toyo NanoEnergy 3 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho Road Venture 798

All Season Touring tires

Kumho Road Venture 798 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
71 owner reviews
Dry
95
Wet
89
Snow
92
Comfort
92
Noise
92
Treadwear
92
Handling
89

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Toyo

Toyo NanoEnergy 3

Summer Premium Touring tires

Toyo NanoEnergy 3 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
76/100
41 owner reviews
Dry
82
Wet
66
Snow
–
Comfort
82
Noise
–
Treadwear
83
Handling
75

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Kumho Road Venture 798 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Road Venture 798 leads by 13
A — Kumho Road Venture 798
95
B — Toyo NanoEnergy 3
82
Why this score
SourceRoad Venture 798NanoEnergy 3
Tyre Reviews owners 75 82

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Road Venture 798 leads by 23
A — Kumho Road Venture 798
89
B — Toyo NanoEnergy 3
66
Why this score
SourceRoad Venture 798NanoEnergy 3
Tyre Reviews owners 63 66

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Road Venture 798
92
B — Toyo NanoEnergy 3
–

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Road Venture 798 leads by 10
A — Kumho Road Venture 798
92
B — Toyo NanoEnergy 3
82
Why this score
SourceRoad Venture 798NanoEnergy 3
Tyre Reviews owners 70 82

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Road Venture 798
92
B — Toyo NanoEnergy 3
–

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Road Venture 798 leads by 9
A — Kumho Road Venture 798
92
B — Toyo NanoEnergy 3
83
Why this score
SourceRoad Venture 798NanoEnergy 3
Tyre Reviews owners 85 83

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Road Venture 798 leads by 14
A — Kumho Road Venture 798
89
B — Toyo NanoEnergy 3
75
Why this score
SourceRoad Venture 798NanoEnergy 3
Tyre Reviews owners 53 75
DriverReviews owners – 84

Scores at a glance

Kumho Road Venture 798 vs Toyo NanoEnergy 3: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Road Venture 798Toyo NanoEnergy 3
Relative Score 91 77
Dry 95 82
Wet 89 66
Snow 92 –
Comfort 92 82
Noise 92 –
Treadwear 92 83
Handling 89 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Road Venture 798

The Kumho Road Venture 798 is widely regarded as a high-value, all-terrain tire that punches above its price point, particularly regarding road noise and ride comfort. While most users praise its performance across various surfaces, including snow and light off-road terrain, a minority of owners report issues with ride quality and uneven wear patterns.

Pros

  • Exceptional value for the price point
  • Surprisingly low road noise for an all-terrain/aggressive tread design
  • Strong dry pavement traction and handling
  • Good longevity and tread wear performance for many users
  • Aesthetically pleasing, aggressive sidewall design

Cons

  • Reports of uneven wear or cupping over time
  • Some users experience vibration or bouncing issues on heavier trucks
  • Wet weather traction can be inconsistent depending on road surface
  • Occasional reports of slow air pressure loss

Observations

  • Owners of heavy-duty trucks (e.g., RAM 2500) reported more significant ride quality issues, such as shaking or bouncing, compared to SUV owners.
  • Users on smaller SUVs and crossovers (e.g., Hyundai Santa Fe) frequently report high satisfaction with longevity and comfort, often comparing them favorably to premium brands like Michelin.
  • The tire is noted for being a quiet alternative to more aggressive mud-terrain tires on vehicles like the Jeep Wrangler and FJ Cruiser.
Tire B Toyo NanoEnergy 3

The Toyo NanoEnergy 3 is widely regarded as a high-value, durable touring tire that excels in dry conditions and offers impressive longevity. While many users praise its quiet ride and comfort, there is a significant divide regarding wet-weather performance, with some drivers reporting a lack of confidence and traction in rainy conditions.

Pros

  • Excellent tread life and durability
  • High level of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry-weather handling and braking
  • High value-for-money proposition

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet-weather grip and hydroplaning concerns
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback
  • Performance degradation noted by some users as the tire ages
  • Not suitable for aggressive or spirited driving

Observations

  • Users with lighter vehicles generally report more favorable experiences than those with heavier or more powerful cars.
  • Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., BMW 3-series) noted that the tire's soft sidewall and touring focus do not suit spirited driving styles.
  • Some users found that adjusting tire pressure is critical to optimizing wet-weather performance.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Road Venture 798 B · Toyo NanoEnergy 3
CategoryAll Season Touring tiresSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Toyo

Winner: Kumho Road Venture 798 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Road Venture 798 scores 89 vs 66 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Road Venture 798 scores 89 vs 75 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Road Venture 798 scores 95 vs 82 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Road Venture 798 scores 92 vs 82 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Road Venture 798
Tire B · Toyo NanoEnergy 3

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.