Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Kumho Road Venture 798 vs Toyo NanoEnergy 3 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Road Venture 798 | NanoEnergy 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 82 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Road Venture 798 | NanoEnergy 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 66 |
Snow
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Road Venture 798 | NanoEnergy 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 82 |
Noise
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Road Venture 798 | NanoEnergy 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 83 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Road Venture 798 | NanoEnergy 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 53 | 75 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 84 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Road Venture 798 | Toyo NanoEnergy 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 91 | 77 |
| Dry | 95 | 82 |
| Wet | 89 | 66 |
| Snow | 92 | – |
| Comfort | 92 | 82 |
| Noise | 92 | – |
| Treadwear | 92 | 83 |
| Handling | 89 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Road Venture 798 is widely regarded as a high-value, all-terrain tire that punches above its price point, particularly regarding road noise and ride comfort. While most users praise its performance across various surfaces, including snow and light off-road terrain, a minority of owners report issues with ride quality and uneven wear patterns.
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price point
- Surprisingly low road noise for an all-terrain/aggressive tread design
- Strong dry pavement traction and handling
- Good longevity and tread wear performance for many users
- Aesthetically pleasing, aggressive sidewall design
Cons
- Reports of uneven wear or cupping over time
- Some users experience vibration or bouncing issues on heavier trucks
- Wet weather traction can be inconsistent depending on road surface
- Occasional reports of slow air pressure loss
Observations
- Owners of heavy-duty trucks (e.g., RAM 2500) reported more significant ride quality issues, such as shaking or bouncing, compared to SUV owners.
- Users on smaller SUVs and crossovers (e.g., Hyundai Santa Fe) frequently report high satisfaction with longevity and comfort, often comparing them favorably to premium brands like Michelin.
- The tire is noted for being a quiet alternative to more aggressive mud-terrain tires on vehicles like the Jeep Wrangler and FJ Cruiser.
The Toyo NanoEnergy 3 is widely regarded as a high-value, durable touring tire that excels in dry conditions and offers impressive longevity. While many users praise its quiet ride and comfort, there is a significant divide regarding wet-weather performance, with some drivers reporting a lack of confidence and traction in rainy conditions.
Pros
- Excellent tread life and durability
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry-weather handling and braking
- High value-for-money proposition
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather grip and hydroplaning concerns
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback
- Performance degradation noted by some users as the tire ages
- Not suitable for aggressive or spirited driving
Observations
- Users with lighter vehicles generally report more favorable experiences than those with heavier or more powerful cars.
- Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., BMW 3-series) noted that the tire's soft sidewall and touring focus do not suit spirited driving styles.
- Some users found that adjusting tire pressure is critical to optimizing wet-weather performance.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Road Venture 798 | B · Toyo NanoEnergy 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho
Toyo
Winner: Kumho Road Venture 798 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Kumho Road Venture 798 scores 89 vs 66 on wet.
Kumho Road Venture 798 scores 89 vs 75 on handling.
Kumho Road Venture 798 scores 95 vs 82 on dry.
Kumho Road Venture 798 scores 92 vs 82 on comfort.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.