Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687 vs Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Bridgestone

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687

Summer Premium Touring tires

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
66/100
6 owner reviews
Dry
82
Wet
61
Snow
90
Comfort
66
Noise
–
Treadwear
71
Handling
64

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho Road Venture APT KL51

All Season Touring tires

Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
90/100
84 owner reviews
Dry
94
Wet
89
Snow
77
Comfort
91
Noise
91
Treadwear
90
Handling
89

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 — better wet, comfort and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687 if snow matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Road Venture APT KL51 leads by 12
A — Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687
82
B — Kumho Road Venture APT KL51
94
Why this score
SourceDueler H/T 687Road Venture APT KL51
Tyre Reviews owners 82 89
SimpleTire owners 87 90

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Road Venture APT KL51 leads by 28
A — Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687
61
B — Kumho Road Venture APT KL51
89
Why this score
SourceDueler H/T 687Road Venture APT KL51
Tyre Reviews owners 58 81
SimpleTire owners 87 86

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Dueler H/T 687 leads by 13
A — Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687
90
B — Kumho Road Venture APT KL51
77
Why this score
SourceDueler H/T 687Road Venture APT KL51
Tyre Reviews owners – 70
SimpleTire owners 87 84

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Road Venture APT KL51 leads by 25
A — Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687
66
B — Kumho Road Venture APT KL51
91
Why this score
SourceDueler H/T 687Road Venture APT KL51
Tyre Reviews owners 65 89
SimpleTire owners 87 90

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687
–
B — Kumho Road Venture APT KL51
91
Why this score
SourceDueler H/T 687Road Venture APT KL51
SimpleTire owners 80 90

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Road Venture APT KL51 leads by 19
A — Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687
71
B — Kumho Road Venture APT KL51
90
Why this score
SourceDueler H/T 687Road Venture APT KL51
Tyre Reviews owners 68 83
SimpleTire owners 73 91

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Road Venture APT KL51 leads by 25
A — Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687
64
B — Kumho Road Venture APT KL51
89
Why this score
SourceDueler H/T 687Road Venture APT KL51
Tyre Reviews owners 64 78

Scores at a glance

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687 vs Kumho Road Venture APT KL51: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Dueler H/T 687Kumho Road Venture APT KL51
Relative Score 71 89
Dry 82 94
Wet 61 89
Snow 90 77
Comfort 66 91
Noise – 91
Treadwear 71 90
Handling 64 89

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687

The Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687 is widely regarded as a durable, long-lasting highway tire that performs reliably in dry conditions and light off-road environments. However, user consensus is polarized regarding its wet-weather capabilities, with many reporting significant traction loss and increased braking distances at higher speeds.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and overall durability
  • Reliable handling and grip in dry road conditions
  • Competent performance on light tracks, dirt, and sand
  • Solid value as a long-term OEM equipment choice

Cons

  • Poor traction and braking performance in wet conditions at highway speeds
  • Inadequate grip on snow, ice, and mud
  • Increased road noise as the tire ages
  • Noticeable decline in handling precision as tread depth decreases

Observations

  • Suzuki owners report mixed experiences, with some finding the tire excellent for light moorland and track use, while others find it lacking in adverse weather.
  • Users note that the tire's performance characteristics, particularly noise and handling, become more pronounced as the vehicle reaches higher speeds (above 60-80 mph).
Tire B Kumho Road Venture APT KL51

The Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 is widely regarded as a high-value, all-season tire that excels in comfort, low road noise, and longevity. While it performs reliably on dry and wet pavement, user consensus suggests it is better suited for highway and light-duty use rather than extreme off-road or deep-snow conditions.

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price point compared to premium competitors.
  • Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort.
  • Strong tread life and durability, with many users reporting high mileage.
  • Reliable traction on dry and wet road surfaces.

Cons

  • Inconsistent performance in deep snow and icy conditions.
  • Reports of potential vibration or balancing issues on heavier vehicles.
  • Not as rugged or aggressive in appearance as dedicated off-road tires.
  • Occasional reports of premature cupping or slow air pressure loss.

Observations

  • Users with heavy-duty trucks (e.g., Dodge RAM 2500) reported ride quality issues, suggesting the tire may be better suited for lighter SUVs and crossovers.
  • Owners of older vehicles and smaller SUVs noted significant improvements in comfort compared to more aggressive, E-load rated tires.
  • High-mileage users on vans and highway-focused vehicles consistently report excellent tread longevity, often exceeding 50,000 miles.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687 B · Kumho Road Venture APT KL51
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresAll Season Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Tread depth10/32″12/32″
UTQG300 B A600 A A
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Kumho

Winner: Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 — better wet, comfort and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687 if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 89 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 91 vs 66 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 89 vs 64 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 90 vs 71 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687
Tire B · Kumho Road Venture APT KL51

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.