Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
General Altimax Comfort vs Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Comfort | Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 89 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Comfort | Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 81 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 86 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Comfort | Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 70 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 84 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Comfort | Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 89 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Comfort | Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Comfort | Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 83 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 91 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Comfort | Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 78 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Altimax Comfort | Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 90 |
| Dry | 82 | 94 |
| Wet | 78 | 89 |
| Snow | – | 77 |
| Comfort | 80 | 91 |
| Noise | – | 91 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 90 |
| Handling | 78 | 89 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The General Altimax Comfort presents a polarized user experience, with many praising its balanced performance, ride quality, and durability. However, significant reports of extreme road noise and specific regional quality control issues suggest inconsistency in the product's performance across different environments.
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and ability to absorb road imperfections
- Strong grip performance in both wet and dry conditions
- Commendable tread longevity and slow wear rates
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium brands
Cons
- Reports of excessive road noise causing driver fatigue
- Potential structural integrity issues leading to premature punctures
- Inconsistent warranty support and manufacturer responsiveness regarding defects
Observations
- Users report high satisfaction with ride quality and pothole absorption, suggesting the tire is well-suited for daily commuting on varied road surfaces.
- Longevity appears consistent for most users, with reports of 12,000 miles showing minimal tread depth reduction.
The Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 is widely regarded as a high-value, all-season tire that excels in comfort, low road noise, and longevity. While it performs reliably on dry and wet pavement, user consensus suggests it is better suited for highway and light-duty use rather than extreme off-road or deep-snow conditions.
Pros
- Excellent value for the price point compared to premium competitors.
- Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort.
- Strong tread life and durability, with many users reporting high mileage.
- Reliable traction on dry and wet road surfaces.
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in deep snow and icy conditions.
- Reports of potential vibration or balancing issues on heavier vehicles.
- Not as rugged or aggressive in appearance as dedicated off-road tires.
- Occasional reports of premature cupping or slow air pressure loss.
Observations
- Users with heavy-duty trucks (e.g., Dodge RAM 2500) reported ride quality issues, suggesting the tire may be better suited for lighter SUVs and crossovers.
- Owners of older vehicles and smaller SUVs noted significant improvements in comfort compared to more aggressive, E-load rated tires.
- High-mileage users on vans and highway-focused vehicles consistently report excellent tread longevity, often exceeding 50,000 miles.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Altimax Comfort | B · Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | — | 12/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 600 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
General
Kumho
Winner: Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 90 vs 63 on treadwear.
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 94 vs 82 on dry.
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 89 vs 78 on wet.
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 91 vs 80 on comfort.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.