74
/ 100
Objective (60%)
72/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
67/100
108 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Turanza T001 vs Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
90
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
90/100
84 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Road Venture APT KL51 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 89 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Road Venture APT KL51 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 81 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 86 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 70 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 84 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Road Venture APT KL51 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 89 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Road Venture APT KL51 leads by 27
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 83 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 91 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Road Venture APT KL51 leads by 22
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 78 |
| DriverReviews owners | 84 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza T001 | Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 90 |
| Dry | 79 | 94 |
| Wet | 88 | 89 |
| Snow | – | 77 |
| Comfort | 72 | 91 |
| Noise | – | 91 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 90 |
| Handling | 67 | 89 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
74
/ 100
Tire A
90
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Turanza T001 receives a polarized reception from users, often serving as a divisive factory-fitted tire. While many drivers appreciate its dry-weather handling, steering feedback, and comfort, a significant portion of the user base reports concerns regarding inconsistent wet-weather performance and premature tread wear.
Pros
- Solid dry-weather grip and handling
- Responsive steering feedback
- Generally comfortable ride quality
- Good value for money at certain price points
Cons
- Inconsistent or poor wet-weather traction and aquaplaning resistance
- Rapid and uneven tread wear reported by many users
- High road noise levels on certain surfaces
- Susceptibility to punctures and sidewall softness
Observations
- Users with FWD vehicles frequently report understeer and rapid front-tire wear compared to rear-axle longevity.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-performance driving styles noted significantly lower mileage expectations than the tire's touring classification suggests.
- Some users on 17-inch and larger wheels noted that the tire's sidewall stiffness can lead to a harsh ride on imperfect road surfaces.
The Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 is widely regarded as a high-value, all-season tire that excels in comfort, low road noise, and longevity. While it performs reliably on dry and wet pavement, user consensus suggests it is better suited for highway and light-duty use rather than extreme off-road or deep-snow conditions.
Pros
- Excellent value for the price point compared to premium competitors.
- Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort.
- Strong tread life and durability, with many users reporting high mileage.
- Reliable traction on dry and wet road surfaces.
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in deep snow and icy conditions.
- Reports of potential vibration or balancing issues on heavier vehicles.
- Not as rugged or aggressive in appearance as dedicated off-road tires.
- Occasional reports of premature cupping or slow air pressure loss.
Observations
- Users with heavy-duty trucks (e.g., Dodge RAM 2500) reported ride quality issues, suggesting the tire may be better suited for lighter SUVs and crossovers.
- Owners of older vehicles and smaller SUVs noted significant improvements in comfort compared to more aggressive, E-load rated tires.
- High-mileage users on vans and highway-focused vehicles consistently report excellent tread longevity, often exceeding 50,000 miles.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza T001 | B · Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | — | 12/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 600 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
74
/ 100
Bridgestone
90
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 90 vs 63 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 89 vs 67 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 91 vs 72 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 94 vs 79 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza T001
Tire B · Kumho Road Venture APT KL51
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Turanza T001 also compared with
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.