72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 vs Kumho Road Venture A/T 825 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
92
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
62 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho Road Venture A/T 825 — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Road Venture A/T 825 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | Road Venture A/T 825 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 85 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Road Venture A/T 825 leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | Road Venture A/T 825 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 75 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Road Venture A/T 825 leads by 31
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | Road Venture A/T 825 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 80 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Road Venture A/T 825 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | Road Venture A/T 825 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 85 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Road Venture A/T 825 leads by 41
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | Road Venture A/T 825 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 65 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich A/T KO2 | Kumho Road Venture A/T 825 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 92 |
| Dry | 84 | 95 |
| Wet | 64 | 90 |
| Snow | 92 | 92 |
| Comfort | 61 | 92 |
| Noise | – | 91 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 91 |
| Handling | 50 | 91 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Tire A
92
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich A/T KO2 is widely regarded as a highly durable and aesthetically aggressive tire that excels in off-road environments and extreme heat. While users praise its longevity and rugged construction, there is a clear consensus regarding its compromises in on-road comfort, noise levels, and wet-weather performance.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability even in extreme temperatures
- Strong off-road traction across varied terrain including rocks, mud, and sand
- Aggressive, iconic visual appeal
- Reliable performance when aired down for off-road use
Cons
- Noticeable road noise during daily driving
- Subpar handling and traction in wet on-road conditions
- Reduced ride comfort compared to less aggressive all-terrain options
Observations
- Owners of smaller, lightweight 4x4s like the Suzuki Jimny report surprisingly good road-holding characteristics.
- The tire demonstrates extreme heat resistance, maintaining structural integrity after years of use in desert climates exceeding 50°C.
The Kumho Road Venture A/T 825 is widely regarded as a high-value all-terrain tire that excels in noise suppression and dry-road comfort. While most users report strong performance across various surfaces, including light off-road terrain and snow, a minority of owners have experienced issues with ride quality and vibration on heavier-duty vehicles.
Pros
- Impressively low road noise for an all-terrain tire
- Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
- Reliable traction on dry pavement and light off-road surfaces
- Good tread longevity and wear characteristics
Cons
- Reports of vibration or ride harshness on heavy-duty trucks
- Potential for uneven wear or cupping
- Harder rubber compound can lead to reduced wet-weather confidence for some drivers
- Occasional reports of slow air pressure loss
Observations
- Owners of heavy-duty trucks (e.g., Dodge RAM 2500) reported significant ride quality issues, suggesting the tire may be better suited for lighter SUVs or half-ton trucks.
- Users transitioning from aggressive off-road tires (like the BFG KO2) to the Kumho 825 noted a marked improvement in ride comfort and noise levels.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2 | B · Kumho Road Venture A/T 825 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
BFGoodrich
92
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Kumho Road Venture A/T 825 — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Road Venture A/T 825 scores 91 vs 50 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Road Venture A/T 825 scores 92 vs 61 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Road Venture A/T 825 scores 90 vs 64 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Road Venture A/T 825 scores 95 vs 84 on dry.
Tire A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2
Tire B · Kumho Road Venture A/T 825
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 also compared with
Kumho Road Venture A/T 825 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.