78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Kumho Road Venture A/T 825 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
92
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
62 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho Road Venture A/T 825 — better treadwear, handling and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Road Venture A/T 825 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Road Venture A/T 825 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 85 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Road Venture A/T 825 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Road Venture A/T 825 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 75 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Road Venture A/T 825 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Road Venture A/T 825 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Road Venture A/T 825 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Road Venture A/T 825 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 80 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Road Venture A/T 825 leads by 11
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Road Venture A/T 825 leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Road Venture A/T 825 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 85 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Road Venture A/T 825 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Road Venture A/T 825 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 65 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | Kumho Road Venture A/T 825 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 92 |
| Dry | 88 | 95 |
| Wet | 83 | 90 |
| Snow | 81 | 92 |
| Comfort | 83 | 92 |
| Noise | 80 | 91 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 91 |
| Handling | 74 | 91 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
92
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra presents a polarized user experience, characterized by a significant divide between those praising its wet and dry handling performance and those disappointed by its longevity and noise levels. While some users report exceptional tread life and reliable all-season traction, others cite premature wear and intrusive road noise, suggesting that performance may vary significantly based on vehicle application and driving conditions.
Pros
- Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
- Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
- Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users
- High durability reported by long-term users
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
- Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
- Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
- Potential for reduced fuel economy
Observations
- Users on heavy SUVs and trucks report mixed results, with some achieving high mileage while others experience rapid tread degradation.
- Drivers transitioning from OEM tires, such as the Bridgestone Ecopia, have noted a distinct increase in cabin noise levels.
- Regular maintenance, specifically rotations every 5,000 miles, is highlighted as critical for maximizing the lifespan of this tire.
The Kumho Road Venture A/T 825 is widely regarded as a high-value all-terrain tire that excels in noise suppression and dry-road comfort. While most users report strong performance across various surfaces, including light off-road terrain and snow, a minority of owners have experienced issues with ride quality and vibration on heavier-duty vehicles.
Pros
- Impressively low road noise for an all-terrain tire
- Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
- Reliable traction on dry pavement and light off-road surfaces
- Good tread longevity and wear characteristics
Cons
- Reports of vibration or ride harshness on heavy-duty trucks
- Potential for uneven wear or cupping
- Harder rubber compound can lead to reduced wet-weather confidence for some drivers
- Occasional reports of slow air pressure loss
Observations
- Owners of heavy-duty trucks (e.g., Dodge RAM 2500) reported significant ride quality issues, suggesting the tire may be better suited for lighter SUVs or half-ton trucks.
- Users transitioning from aggressive off-road tires (like the BFG KO2) to the Kumho 825 noted a marked improvement in ride comfort and noise levels.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | B · Kumho Road Venture A/T 825 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 46 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 800 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Bridgestone
92
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Kumho Road Venture A/T 825 — better treadwear, handling and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Road Venture A/T 825 scores 91 vs 66 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Road Venture A/T 825 scores 91 vs 74 on handling.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Kumho Road Venture A/T 825 scores 92 vs 81 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Kumho Road Venture A/T 825 scores 91 vs 80 on noise.
Tire A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Tire B · Kumho Road Venture A/T 825
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra also compared with
Kumho Road Venture A/T 825 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.