Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 vs Kumho Road Venture MT51 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Kumho Road Venture MT51
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | Road Venture MT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 75 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 94 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | Road Venture MT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 93 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 63 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 87 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | Road Venture MT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 63 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 83 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | Road Venture MT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 65 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 91 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | Road Venture MT51 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 83 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | Road Venture MT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 75 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 73 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 83 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | Road Venture MT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 58 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich A/T KO2 | Kumho Road Venture MT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 90 |
| Dry | 84 | 95 |
| Wet | 64 | 89 |
| Snow | 92 | 82 |
| Comfort | 61 | 91 |
| Noise | – | 92 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 91 |
| Handling | 50 | 90 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich A/T KO2 is widely regarded as a highly durable and aesthetically aggressive tire that excels in off-road environments and extreme heat. While users praise its longevity and rugged construction, there is a clear consensus regarding its compromises in on-road comfort, noise levels, and wet-weather performance.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability even in extreme temperatures
- Strong off-road traction across varied terrain including rocks, mud, and sand
- Aggressive, iconic visual appeal
- Reliable performance when aired down for off-road use
Cons
- Noticeable road noise during daily driving
- Subpar handling and traction in wet on-road conditions
- Reduced ride comfort compared to less aggressive all-terrain options
Observations
- Owners of smaller, lightweight 4x4s like the Suzuki Jimny report surprisingly good road-holding characteristics.
- The tire demonstrates extreme heat resistance, maintaining structural integrity after years of use in desert climates exceeding 50°C.
The Kumho Road Venture M/T51 is widely regarded as a high-value mud-terrain tire that punches above its weight class, particularly regarding road noise and comfort. While most users praise its off-road capability and surprisingly quiet highway manners, some report sensitivity to tire pressure and occasional traction limitations in wet or icy conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price point compared to premium competitors
- Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
- Strong off-road traction in mud, gravel, and rocky terrain
- Comfortable ride quality on pavement
- Good tread life and durability when properly maintained
Cons
- Potential for reduced wet-weather traction if tire pressure is not optimized
- Some reports of vibration or balancing issues on heavy-duty trucks
- Susceptibility to cupping if not rotated regularly
- Noticeable decrease in fuel economy compared to highway-terrain tires
Observations
- Users on lighter vehicles like Jeeps and smaller SUVs frequently report higher satisfaction with ride comfort compared to heavy-duty truck owners.
- Heavy-duty truck owners (e.g., RAM 2500) occasionally report ride quality issues, such as shaking or bouncing, which may be linked to load ratings or pressure sensitivity.
- Regular tire rotation is explicitly noted as a critical factor for maintaining the tire's quiet performance over its lifespan.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2 | B · Kumho Road Venture MT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires | — |
| Tread depth | — | 18/32″ |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 80 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich
Kumho
Winner: Kumho Road Venture MT51 — better handling, comfort and wet. Pick the BFGoodrich A/T KO2 if snow matters most to you.
Kumho Road Venture MT51 scores 90 vs 50 on handling.
Kumho Road Venture MT51 scores 91 vs 61 on comfort.
Kumho Road Venture MT51 scores 89 vs 64 on wet.
Kumho Road Venture MT51 scores 95 vs 84 on dry.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.