Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

BFGoodrich A/T KO2 vs Kumho Road Venture MT51 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A BFGoodrich

BFGoodrich A/T KO2

All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires

BFGoodrich A/T KO2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
7 owner reviews
Dry
84
Wet
64
Snow
92
Comfort
61
Noise
–
Treadwear
80
Handling
50

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Kumho Road Venture MT51 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
71 owner reviews
Dry
95
Wet
89
Snow
82
Comfort
91
Noise
92
Treadwear
91
Handling
90

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Kumho Road Venture MT51 — better handling, comfort and wet. Pick the BFGoodrich A/T KO2 if snow matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Road Venture MT51 leads by 11
A — BFGoodrich A/T KO2
84
B — Kumho Road Venture MT51
95
Why this score
SourceA/T KO2Road Venture MT51
Tire Rack owners – 87
Tyre Reviews owners 83 75
SimpleTire owners – 94

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Road Venture MT51 leads by 25
A — BFGoodrich A/T KO2
64
B — Kumho Road Venture MT51
89
Why this score
SourceA/T KO2Road Venture MT51
Tire Rack owners – 93
Tyre Reviews owners 60 63
SimpleTire owners – 87

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) A/T KO2 leads by 10
A — BFGoodrich A/T KO2
92
B — Kumho Road Venture MT51
82
Why this score
SourceA/T KO2Road Venture MT51
Tire Rack owners – 88
Tyre Reviews owners – 63
SimpleTire owners – 83

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Road Venture MT51 leads by 30
A — BFGoodrich A/T KO2
61
B — Kumho Road Venture MT51
91
Why this score
SourceA/T KO2Road Venture MT51
Tire Rack owners – 84
Tyre Reviews owners 57 65
SimpleTire owners – 91

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich A/T KO2
–
B — Kumho Road Venture MT51
92
Why this score
SourceA/T KO2Road Venture MT51
SimpleTire owners – 83

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Road Venture MT51 leads by 11
A — BFGoodrich A/T KO2
80
B — Kumho Road Venture MT51
91
Why this score
SourceA/T KO2Road Venture MT51
Tire Rack owners – 75
Tyre Reviews owners 79 73
SimpleTire owners – 83

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Road Venture MT51 leads by 40
A — BFGoodrich A/T KO2
50
B — Kumho Road Venture MT51
90
Why this score
SourceA/T KO2Road Venture MT51
Tyre Reviews owners 50 58

Scores at a glance

BFGoodrich A/T KO2 vs Kumho Road Venture MT51: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich A/T KO2Kumho Road Venture MT51
Relative Score 72 90
Dry 84 95
Wet 64 89
Snow 92 82
Comfort 61 91
Noise – 92
Treadwear 80 91
Handling 50 90

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BFGoodrich A/T KO2

The BFGoodrich A/T KO2 is widely regarded as a highly durable and aesthetically aggressive tire that excels in off-road environments and extreme heat. While users praise its longevity and rugged construction, there is a clear consensus regarding its compromises in on-road comfort, noise levels, and wet-weather performance.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and durability even in extreme temperatures
  • Strong off-road traction across varied terrain including rocks, mud, and sand
  • Aggressive, iconic visual appeal
  • Reliable performance when aired down for off-road use

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise during daily driving
  • Subpar handling and traction in wet on-road conditions
  • Reduced ride comfort compared to less aggressive all-terrain options

Observations

  • Owners of smaller, lightweight 4x4s like the Suzuki Jimny report surprisingly good road-holding characteristics.
  • The tire demonstrates extreme heat resistance, maintaining structural integrity after years of use in desert climates exceeding 50°C.
Tire B Kumho Road Venture MT51

The Kumho Road Venture M/T51 is widely regarded as a high-value mud-terrain tire that punches above its weight class, particularly regarding road noise and comfort. While most users praise its off-road capability and surprisingly quiet highway manners, some report sensitivity to tire pressure and occasional traction limitations in wet or icy conditions.

Pros

  • Exceptional value for the price point compared to premium competitors
  • Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
  • Strong off-road traction in mud, gravel, and rocky terrain
  • Comfortable ride quality on pavement
  • Good tread life and durability when properly maintained

Cons

  • Potential for reduced wet-weather traction if tire pressure is not optimized
  • Some reports of vibration or balancing issues on heavy-duty trucks
  • Susceptibility to cupping if not rotated regularly
  • Noticeable decrease in fuel economy compared to highway-terrain tires

Observations

  • Users on lighter vehicles like Jeeps and smaller SUVs frequently report higher satisfaction with ride comfort compared to heavy-duty truck owners.
  • Heavy-duty truck owners (e.g., RAM 2500) occasionally report ride quality issues, such as shaking or bouncing, which may be linked to load ratings or pressure sensitivity.
  • Regular tire rotation is explicitly noted as a critical factor for maintaining the tire's quiet performance over its lifespan.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2 B · Kumho Road Venture MT51
CategoryAll Season All Terrain and Off Road tires—
Tread depth—18/32″
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—80 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich

Kumho

Winner: Kumho Road Venture MT51 — better handling, comfort and wet. Pick the BFGoodrich A/T KO2 if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Road Venture MT51 scores 90 vs 50 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Road Venture MT51 scores 91 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Road Venture MT51 scores 89 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Road Venture MT51 scores 95 vs 84 on dry.

Tire A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2
Tire B · Kumho Road Venture MT51

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.