61
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
57/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Kumho Solus KH25 vs Nexen N FERA AU7 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
90
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
89/100
14 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen N FERA AU7 — better treadwear, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
N FERA AU7 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH25 | N FERA AU7 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 69 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 100 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
N FERA AU7 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH25 | N FERA AU7 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 55 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 90 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
N FERA AU7 leads by 55
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH25 | N FERA AU7 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 31 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
N FERA AU7 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH25 | N FERA AU7 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 54 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 90 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
N FERA AU7 leads by 57
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH25 | N FERA AU7 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 48 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 20 | 90 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH25 | N FERA AU7 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 90 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Solus KH25 | Nexen N FERA AU7 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 90 |
| Dry | 80 | 94 |
| Wet | 72 | 91 |
| Snow | 31 | 86 |
| Comfort | 78 | 92 |
| Noise | – | 86 |
| Treadwear | 29 | 86 |
| Handling | 90 | 90 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
61
/ 100
Tire A
90
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Solus KH25 is generally regarded as a competent factory-equipped tire that offers a smooth ride and reliable dry handling. While users appreciate its versatility as an M+S rated tire, concerns regarding long-term structural durability and sidewall integrity prevent it from being a top-tier recommendation.
Pros
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
- Strong dry weather handling performance
- M+S (Mud and Snow) rating provides seasonal versatility
- Good value as an original equipment option
Cons
- Concerns regarding sidewall durability and construction quality
- Limited tread life expectancy
- Wet weather grip is described as merely adequate
Observations
- Commonly found as original equipment on compact vehicles like the Kia Rio5.
- Users note that the tire's performance characteristics are better suited for daily commuting rather than high-performance driving.
The Nexen N Fera AU7 is widely regarded as a high-value all-season tire that delivers impressive comfort, quiet operation, and reliable handling across various weather conditions. While most users are highly satisfied with the performance-to-price ratio, some reports of premature tread wear and uneven wear patterns suggest inconsistent longevity for certain driving styles.
Pros
- Excellent value for the price point
- Quiet and smooth ride quality
- Strong handling and grip in dry, wet, and light snow conditions
- High level of driver confidence in inclement weather
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and cupping
- Potential for uneven wear patterns over time
- Minor tracking issues on specific road surfaces like bridge gratings
Observations
- Users transitioning from dedicated Ultra High Performance tires to the N Fera AU7 on sedans like the Mazda 6 noted a slight decrease in fuel economy.
- Drivers of European sedans, such as the Audi A4, report satisfactory all-season performance but note that tread life may be limited to approximately 30,000-40,000 miles.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Solus KH25 | B · Nexen N FERA AU7 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
61
/ 100
Kumho
90
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Nexen N FERA AU7 — better treadwear, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Nexen N FERA AU7 scores 86 vs 29 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Nexen N FERA AU7 scores 86 vs 31 on snow.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N FERA AU7 scores 91 vs 72 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N FERA AU7 scores 94 vs 80 on dry.
Tire A · Kumho Solus KH25
Tire B · Nexen N FERA AU7
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Solus KH25 also compared with
Nexen N FERA AU7 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.