Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Nexen N FERA AU7 vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Nexen

Nexen N FERA AU7

Summer Premium Touring tires

Nexen N FERA AU7 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
89/100
14 owner reviews
Dry
94
Wet
91
Snow
86
Comfort
92
Noise
86
Treadwear
86
Handling
90

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Yokohama Advan Sport AS tread pattern
Objective (60%)
67/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
74/100
12 owner reviews
Dry
77
Wet
67
Snow
60
Comfort
80
Noise
76
Treadwear
71
Handling
73

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Nexen N FERA AU7 — better snow, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) N FERA AU7 leads by 17
A — Nexen N FERA AU7
94
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
77
Why this score
SourceN FERA AU7Advan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 70
Tyre Reviews owners 100 80

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) N FERA AU7 leads by 24
A — Nexen N FERA AU7
91
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
67
Why this score
SourceN FERA AU7Advan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 58
Tyre Reviews owners 90 73

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) N FERA AU7 leads by 26
A — Nexen N FERA AU7
86
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
60
Why this score
SourceN FERA AU7Advan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners – 60

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) N FERA AU7 leads by 12
A — Nexen N FERA AU7
92
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
80
Why this score
SourceN FERA AU7Advan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 78
Tyre Reviews owners 90 90

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) N FERA AU7 leads by 10
A — Nexen N FERA AU7
86
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
76
Why this score
SourceN FERA AU7Advan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 76

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) N FERA AU7 leads by 15
A — Nexen N FERA AU7
86
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
71
Why this score
SourceN FERA AU7Advan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners 90 80

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) N FERA AU7 leads by 17
A — Nexen N FERA AU7
90
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
73
Why this score
SourceN FERA AU7Advan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners 90 73

Scores at a glance

Nexen N FERA AU7 vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNexen N FERA AU7Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Relative Score 89 71
Dry 94 77
Wet 91 67
Snow 86 60
Comfort 92 80
Noise 86 76
Treadwear 86 71
Handling 90 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Nexen N FERA AU7

The Nexen N Fera AU7 is widely regarded as a high-value all-season tire that delivers impressive comfort, quiet operation, and reliable handling across various weather conditions. While most users are highly satisfied with the performance-to-price ratio, some reports of premature tread wear and uneven wear patterns suggest inconsistent longevity for certain driving styles.

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price point
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Strong handling and grip in dry, wet, and light snow conditions
  • High level of driver confidence in inclement weather

Cons

  • Reports of premature tread wear and cupping
  • Potential for uneven wear patterns over time
  • Minor tracking issues on specific road surfaces like bridge gratings

Observations

  • Users transitioning from dedicated Ultra High Performance tires to the N Fera AU7 on sedans like the Mazda 6 noted a slight decrease in fuel economy.
  • Drivers of European sedans, such as the Audi A4, report satisfactory all-season performance but note that tread life may be limited to approximately 30,000-40,000 miles.
Tire B Yokohama Advan Sport AS

The Yokohama Advan Sport AS is generally regarded as a competent, budget-friendly performance tire that excels in comfort and dry-road handling. While many users appreciate the value proposition and smooth ride quality, there is a notable divide regarding tread longevity and wet-weather performance, with some users reporting premature wear and stability concerns.

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price, especially when sourced as discounted inventory
  • Smooth and quiet ride quality
  • Strong dry-road grip and cornering performance
  • Improved acceleration times compared to previous sets

Cons

  • Significant concerns regarding rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Inconsistent performance in wet or cool conditions
  • Lack of high-end performance feedback for spirited driving
  • Potential for stability issues at highway speeds

Observations

  • Users transitioning from run-flat tires to this standard construction report improved ride comfort.
  • One user noted superior tread longevity on an electric vehicle compared to their previous Pirelli tires.
  • Performance-oriented drivers found the tire insufficient for track-day longevity, noting rapid degradation after limited use.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N FERA AU7 B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
CategorySummer Premium Touring tires—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Tread depth—11/32″
UTQG—440 A A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen

Yokohama

Winner: Nexen N FERA AU7 — better snow, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Nexen N FERA AU7 scores 86 vs 60 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N FERA AU7 scores 91 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen N FERA AU7 scores 94 vs 77 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N FERA AU7 scores 90 vs 73 on handling.

Tire A · Nexen N FERA AU7
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.