78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
8 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Latitude Tour vs Nexen N FERA AU7 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
90
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
89/100
14 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen N FERA AU7 — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
N FERA AU7 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Tour | N FERA AU7 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 100 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
N FERA AU7 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Tour | N FERA AU7 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 90 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
N FERA AU7 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Tour | N FERA AU7 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 64 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
N FERA AU7 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Tour | N FERA AU7 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 90 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
N FERA AU7 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Tour | N FERA AU7 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 90 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
N FERA AU7 leads by 27
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Tour | N FERA AU7 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 90 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Latitude Tour | Nexen N FERA AU7 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 90 |
| Dry | 90 | 94 |
| Wet | 80 | 91 |
| Snow | 78 | 86 |
| Comfort | 75 | 92 |
| Noise | – | 86 |
| Treadwear | 78 | 86 |
| Handling | 63 | 90 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
90
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Latitude Tour is generally regarded as a long-lasting, quiet, and comfortable tire suitable for highway and light-duty SUV use. While many users praise its longevity and refined road manners, some report inconsistent experiences regarding tread wear, ride stiffness, and handling precision depending on the specific vehicle application.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Very low road noise levels
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
- Reliable grip in dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Stiff ride characteristics, particularly in colder temperatures
- Inconsistent tread wear patterns, including premature flaking
- Limited performance in true winter conditions despite M+S rating
- Narrower visual profile compared to competitors
Observations
- Users on heavier SUVs or vehicles with higher load ratings noted a stiffer, less compliant ride quality.
- Drivers of older vehicles reported that the tire's handling characteristics can be sensitive to road camber, which may be misattributed to vehicle suspension issues.
The Nexen N Fera AU7 is widely regarded as a high-value all-season tire that delivers impressive comfort, quiet operation, and reliable handling across various weather conditions. While most users are highly satisfied with the performance-to-price ratio, some reports of premature tread wear and uneven wear patterns suggest inconsistent longevity for certain driving styles.
Pros
- Excellent value for the price point
- Quiet and smooth ride quality
- Strong handling and grip in dry, wet, and light snow conditions
- High level of driver confidence in inclement weather
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and cupping
- Potential for uneven wear patterns over time
- Minor tracking issues on specific road surfaces like bridge gratings
Observations
- Users transitioning from dedicated Ultra High Performance tires to the N Fera AU7 on sedans like the Mazda 6 noted a slight decrease in fuel economy.
- Drivers of European sedans, such as the Audi A4, report satisfactory all-season performance but note that tread life may be limited to approximately 30,000-40,000 miles.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Latitude Tour | B · Nexen N FERA AU7 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Michelin
90
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Nexen N FERA AU7 — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen N FERA AU7 scores 90 vs 63 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N FERA AU7 scores 92 vs 75 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N FERA AU7 scores 91 vs 80 on wet.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Nexen N FERA AU7 scores 86 vs 78 on snow.
Tire A · Michelin Latitude Tour
Tire B · Nexen N FERA AU7
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Latitude Tour also compared with
Nexen N FERA AU7 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.