89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
89/100
14 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Nexen N FERA AU7 vs Nexen N Fera RU5 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
87
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
90/100
18 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen N FERA AU7 — better snow, handling and dry. Pick the Nexen N Fera RU5 if noise matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
N FERA AU7 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | N FERA AU7 | N Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 87 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
N FERA AU7 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | N FERA AU7 | N Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 87 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
N FERA AU7 leads by 10
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | N FERA AU7 | N Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 97 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
N Fera RU5 leads by 5
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
N Fera RU5 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | N FERA AU7 | N Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 90 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
N FERA AU7 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | N FERA AU7 | N Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 83 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N FERA AU7 | Nexen N Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 89 | 87 |
| Dry | 94 | 91 |
| Wet | 91 | 88 |
| Snow | 86 | 76 |
| Comfort | 92 | 92 |
| Noise | 86 | 91 |
| Treadwear | 86 | 87 |
| Handling | 90 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
89
/ 100
Tire A
87
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Nexen N Fera AU7 is widely regarded as a high-value all-season tire that delivers impressive comfort, quiet operation, and reliable handling across various weather conditions. While most users are highly satisfied with the performance-to-price ratio, some reports of premature tread wear and uneven wear patterns suggest inconsistent longevity for certain driving styles.
Pros
- Excellent value for the price point
- Quiet and smooth ride quality
- Strong handling and grip in dry, wet, and light snow conditions
- High level of driver confidence in inclement weather
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and cupping
- Potential for uneven wear patterns over time
- Minor tracking issues on specific road surfaces like bridge gratings
Observations
- Users transitioning from dedicated Ultra High Performance tires to the N Fera AU7 on sedans like the Mazda 6 noted a slight decrease in fuel economy.
- Drivers of European sedans, such as the Audi A4, report satisfactory all-season performance but note that tread life may be limited to approximately 30,000-40,000 miles.
The Nexen N'Fera RU5 is widely regarded as a high-value tire that delivers performance comparable to premium brands at a significantly lower price point. While most users praise its wet-weather traction, longevity, and comfort, there is a notable divide regarding its winter capabilities, with some users reporting poor performance in snow.
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price compared to premium competitors
- Strong wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- Impressive tread life and durability
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in snow and icy conditions
- Potential for flat-spotting in cold temperatures
- Marketed as all-season but perceived by some as better suited for summer/wet climates
Observations
- Users on larger 20-inch wheels reported a significant improvement in noise levels and comfort compared to factory-fitted performance tires.
- The tire demonstrates high durability on front-wheel-drive configurations, with some users reporting significantly higher mileage compared to other performance-oriented brands.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N FERA AU7 | B · Nexen N Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
89
/ 100
Nexen
87
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Nexen N FERA AU7 — better snow, handling and dry. Pick the Nexen N Fera RU5 if noise matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Nexen N FERA AU7 scores 86 vs 76 on snow.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen N FERA AU7 scores 90 vs 83 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Nexen N Fera RU5 scores 91 vs 86 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N FERA AU7 scores 94 vs 91 on dry.
Tire A · Nexen N FERA AU7
Tire B · Nexen N Fera RU5
More comparisons
Also compared with
Nexen N FERA AU7 also compared with
Nexen N Fera RU5 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.