Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Falken Sincera SN250A A/S vs Kumho Solus TA31 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Falken Sincera SN250A A/S tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
33/100
Owner ratings
Dry
80
Wet
73
Snow
60
Comfort
71
Noise
67
Treadwear
59
Handling
80

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho Solus TA31

All Season Premium Touring tires

Kumho Solus TA31 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
9 owner reviews
Dry
75
Wet
64
Snow
44
Comfort
74
Noise
–
Treadwear
63
Handling
64

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Falken Sincera SN250A A/S — better snow, handling and wet. Pick the Kumho Solus TA31 if treadwear and comfort matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Sincera SN250A A/S leads by 5
A — Falken Sincera SN250A A/S
80
B — Kumho Solus TA31
75
Why this score
SourceSincera SN250A A/SSolus TA31
Tire Rack owners 79 85
Tyre Reviews owners – 74
SimpleTire owners 100 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Sincera SN250A A/S leads by 9
A — Falken Sincera SN250A A/S
73
B — Kumho Solus TA31
64
Why this score
SourceSincera SN250A A/SSolus TA31
Tire Rack owners 73 77
Tyre Reviews owners – 63
SimpleTire owners 100 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Sincera SN250A A/S leads by 16
A — Falken Sincera SN250A A/S
60
B — Kumho Solus TA31
44
Why this score
SourceSincera SN250A A/SSolus TA31
Tire Rack owners 54 57
Tyre Reviews owners – 43
SimpleTire owners 80 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Solus TA31 leads by 3
A — Falken Sincera SN250A A/S
71
B — Kumho Solus TA31
74
Why this score
SourceSincera SN250A A/SSolus TA31
Tire Rack owners 70 78
Tyre Reviews owners – 73
SimpleTire owners 100 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Falken Sincera SN250A A/S
67
B — Kumho Solus TA31
–
Why this score
SourceSincera SN250A A/SSolus TA31
SimpleTire owners 100 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Solus TA31 leads by 4
A — Falken Sincera SN250A A/S
59
B — Kumho Solus TA31
63
Why this score
SourceSincera SN250A A/SSolus TA31
Tire Rack owners 59 78
Tyre Reviews owners – 61
SimpleTire owners 100 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Sincera SN250A A/S leads by 16
A — Falken Sincera SN250A A/S
80
B — Kumho Solus TA31
64
Why this score
SourceSincera SN250A A/SSolus TA31
Tyre Reviews owners – 64

Scores at a glance

Falken Sincera SN250A A/S vs Kumho Solus TA31: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken Sincera SN250A A/SKumho Solus TA31
Relative Score 70 64
Dry 80 75
Wet 73 64
Snow 60 44
Comfort 71 74
Noise 67 –
Treadwear 59 63
Handling 80 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Falken Sincera SN250A A/S

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Kumho Solus TA31

The Kumho Solus TA31 receives a polarized reception, with users divided between those who value its quiet ride and affordability and those who find its handling and longevity lacking. While some drivers report excellent value and high mileage, others express significant concerns regarding stability during emergency maneuvers and premature tread wear.

Pros

  • Low noise levels and high ride comfort
  • Strong value for money
  • Attractive aesthetic design
  • Reliable performance for conservative, daily driving

Cons

  • Unpredictable handling during emergency maneuvers
  • Concerns regarding premature or uneven tread wear
  • Poor stability control compared to premium competitors
  • Reports of inconsistent tire pressure retention

Observations

  • Users noted that low-profile versions of this tire appear more susceptible to accelerated wear.
  • Front-wheel-drive vehicle owners reported higher-than-average wear rates on the front axle.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Sincera SN250A A/S B · Kumho Solus TA31
Category—All Season Premium Touring tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available719
Rim diameters14″ – 17″15″ – 20″
Tread depth10/32″9.5/32″
UTQG320 B B500 A A
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi44 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken

Kumho

Winner: Falken Sincera SN250A A/S — better snow, handling and wet. Pick the Kumho Solus TA31 if treadwear and comfort matter most to you.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Falken Sincera SN250A A/S scores 60 vs 44 on snow.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken Sincera SN250A A/S scores 80 vs 64 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Sincera SN250A A/S scores 73 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken Sincera SN250A A/S scores 80 vs 75 on dry.

Tire A · Falken Sincera SN250A A/S
Tire B · Kumho Solus TA31

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.