88
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Falken Ziez ZE950 AS vs Kumho Solus TA31 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
64
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Falken Ziez ZE950 AS — better snow, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ziez ZE950 AS leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Ziez ZE950 AS | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 74 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ziez ZE950 AS leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | Ziez ZE950 AS | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 63 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Ziez ZE950 AS leads by 56
Why this score
| Source | Ziez ZE950 AS | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 57 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 43 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ziez ZE950 AS leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Ziez ZE950 AS | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 73 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ziez ZE950 AS leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Ziez ZE950 AS | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 61 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ziez ZE950 AS leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Ziez ZE950 AS | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 64 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Ziez ZE950 AS | Kumho Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 88 | 64 |
| Dry | 90 | 75 |
| Wet | 85 | 64 |
| Snow | 100 | 44 |
| Comfort | 100 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 63 |
| Handling | 90 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
88
/ 100
Tire A
64
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Falken Ziex ZE950 AS is widely regarded as a high-value tire that delivers a premium driving experience without the premium price tag. Users consistently praise its ability to balance ride comfort and handling, making it a popular choice for drivers seeking an affordable upgrade for daily commuting.
Pros
- Excellent value for the price point
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
- Low road noise levels
- Responsive handling and cornering performance
Cons
- Limited tread life warranty compared to some competitors
- Potential trade-off between handling performance and longevity
Observations
- Users report that the tire maintains the premium driving characteristics of luxury-oriented vehicles like the Infiniti FX35.
- The tire is frequently noted for its ability to improve or maintain ride quality on vehicles where handling and comfort are high priorities.
The Kumho Solus TA31 receives a polarized reception, with users divided between those who value its quiet ride and affordability and those who find its handling and longevity lacking. While some drivers report excellent value and high mileage, others express significant concerns regarding stability during emergency maneuvers and premature tread wear.
Pros
- Low noise levels and high ride comfort
- Strong value for money
- Attractive aesthetic design
- Reliable performance for conservative, daily driving
Cons
- Unpredictable handling during emergency maneuvers
- Concerns regarding premature or uneven tread wear
- Poor stability control compared to premium competitors
- Reports of inconsistent tire pressure retention
Observations
- Users noted that low-profile versions of this tire appear more susceptible to accelerated wear.
- Front-wheel-drive vehicle owners reported higher-than-average wear rates on the front axle.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Ziez ZE950 AS | B · Kumho Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season High Performance tires | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 19 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9.5/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
88
/ 100
Falken
64
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Falken Ziez ZE950 AS — better snow, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Falken Ziez ZE950 AS scores 100 vs 44 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Falken Ziez ZE950 AS scores 100 vs 74 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Falken Ziez ZE950 AS scores 90 vs 64 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Falken Ziez ZE950 AS scores 85 vs 64 on wet.
Tire A · Falken Ziez ZE950 AS
Tire B · Kumho Solus TA31
More comparisons
Also compared with
Falken Ziez ZE950 AS also compared with
Kumho Solus TA31 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.