Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max vs Kumho Solus TA31 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Assurance Fuel Max | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 76 | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 74 |
| SimpleTire owners | 95 | – |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Assurance Fuel Max | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 73 | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 63 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | – |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Assurance Fuel Max | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 56 | 57 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 43 |
| SimpleTire owners | 85 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Assurance Fuel Max | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 69 | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 73 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Assurance Fuel Max | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 88 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Assurance Fuel Max | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 71 | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 61 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Assurance Fuel Max | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 64 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max | Kumho Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 64 |
| Dry | 88 | 75 |
| Wet | 84 | 64 |
| Snow | 74 | 44 |
| Comfort | 82 | 74 |
| Noise | 87 | – |
| Treadwear | 85 | 63 |
| Handling | 70 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max is widely regarded as a reliable, long-lasting tire that excels in fuel efficiency and tread longevity. While some users note average performance in terms of grip and noise, the consensus points to it being a highly practical choice for high-mileage commuters and large vehicle owners seeking value over time.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life with many users reporting over 50,000 miles
- Measurable improvements in fuel economy
- Consistent and reliable performance for daily on-road driving
- Good value proposition due to long-term durability
Cons
- Average grip and handling characteristics
- Noise levels can be slightly higher than premium touring alternatives
- Higher initial purchase price compared to some competitors
Observations
- Large SUV and truck owners, such as those driving a Yukon XL, report excellent longevity and suitability for heavy-duty on-road use.
- Users note that the fuel-saving benefits are noticeable even when only installed on the front axle of smaller sedans like the Toyota Corolla.
The Kumho Solus TA31 receives a polarized reception, with users divided between those who value its quiet ride and affordability and those who find its handling and longevity lacking. While some drivers report excellent value and high mileage, others express significant concerns regarding stability during emergency maneuvers and premature tread wear.
Pros
- Low noise levels and high ride comfort
- Strong value for money
- Attractive aesthetic design
- Reliable performance for conservative, daily driving
Cons
- Unpredictable handling during emergency maneuvers
- Concerns regarding premature or uneven tread wear
- Poor stability control compared to premium competitors
- Reports of inconsistent tire pressure retention
Observations
- Users noted that low-profile versions of this tire appear more susceptible to accelerated wear.
- Front-wheel-drive vehicle owners reported higher-than-average wear rates on the front axle.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max | B · Kumho Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 7 | 19 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 9.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 580 - 620 A A - B | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear
Kumho
Winner: Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max — better snow, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max scores 74 vs 44 on snow.
Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max scores 85 vs 63 on treadwear.
Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max scores 84 vs 64 on wet.
Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max scores 88 vs 75 on dry.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.