Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Hankook Optimo H725A vs Kumho Solus TA31 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Hankook Optimo H725A tread pattern
Objective (60%)
/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
41/100
Owner ratings
Dry
71
Wet
56
Snow
42
Comfort
68
Noise
67
Treadwear
74
Handling
70

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho Solus TA31

All Season Premium Touring tires

Kumho Solus TA31 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
9 owner reviews
Dry
75
Wet
64
Snow
44
Comfort
74
Noise
Treadwear
63
Handling
64

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Hankook Optimo H725A and Kumho Solus TA31 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Optimo H725A is stronger on treadwear and handling. Kumho Solus TA31 is stronger on wet, comfort and dry.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Solus TA31 leads by 4
A — Hankook Optimo H725A
71
B — Kumho Solus TA31
75
Why this score
SourceOptimo H725ASolus TA31
Tire Rack owners 85
Tyre Reviews owners 74

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Solus TA31 leads by 8
A — Hankook Optimo H725A
56
B — Kumho Solus TA31
64
Why this score
SourceOptimo H725ASolus TA31
Tire Rack owners 77
Tyre Reviews owners 63

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Solus TA31 leads by 2
A — Hankook Optimo H725A
42
B — Kumho Solus TA31
44
Why this score
SourceOptimo H725ASolus TA31
Tire Rack owners 57
Tyre Reviews owners 43

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Solus TA31 leads by 6
A — Hankook Optimo H725A
68
B — Kumho Solus TA31
74
Why this score
SourceOptimo H725ASolus TA31
Tire Rack owners 78
Tyre Reviews owners 73

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Optimo H725A
67
B — Kumho Solus TA31

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Optimo H725A leads by 11
A — Hankook Optimo H725A
74
B — Kumho Solus TA31
63
Why this score
SourceOptimo H725ASolus TA31
Tire Rack owners 78
Tyre Reviews owners 61

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Optimo H725A leads by 6
A — Hankook Optimo H725A
70
B — Kumho Solus TA31
64
Why this score
SourceOptimo H725ASolus TA31
Tyre Reviews owners 64

Scores at a glance

Hankook Optimo H725A vs Kumho Solus TA31: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Optimo H725AKumho Solus TA31
Relative Score 64 64
Dry 71 75
Wet 56 64
Snow 42 44
Comfort 68 74
Noise 67
Treadwear 74 63
Handling 70 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook Optimo H725A

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Kumho Solus TA31

The Kumho Solus TA31 receives a polarized reception, with users divided between those who value its quiet ride and affordability and those who find its handling and longevity lacking. While some drivers report excellent value and high mileage, others express significant concerns regarding stability during emergency maneuvers and premature tread wear.

Pros

  • Low noise levels and high ride comfort
  • Strong value for money
  • Attractive aesthetic design
  • Reliable performance for conservative, daily driving

Cons

  • Unpredictable handling during emergency maneuvers
  • Concerns regarding premature or uneven tread wear
  • Poor stability control compared to premium competitors
  • Reports of inconsistent tire pressure retention

Observations

  • Users noted that low-profile versions of this tire appear more susceptible to accelerated wear.
  • Front-wheel-drive vehicle owners reported higher-than-average wear rates on the front axle.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Optimo H725A B · Kumho Solus TA31
CategoryAll Season Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available19
Rim diameters15″ – 20″
Tread depth9.5/32″
UTQG500 A A
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi
SidewallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Kumho

Too close to call: Hankook Optimo H725A and Kumho Solus TA31 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Optimo H725A is stronger on treadwear and handling. Kumho Solus TA31 is stronger on wet, comfort and dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Optimo H725A scores 74 vs 63 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Solus TA31 scores 64 vs 56 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Optimo H725A scores 70 vs 64 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Solus TA31 scores 74 vs 68 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Optimo H725A
Tire B · Kumho Solus TA31

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.