Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Kumho Sense KR26 vs Kumho Solus TA31 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho Sense KR26

All Season Premium Touring tires

Kumho Sense KR26 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
51/100
3 owner reviews
Dry
60
Wet
47
Snow
30
Comfort
70
Treadwear
–
Handling
80

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho Solus TA31

All Season Premium Touring tires

Kumho Solus TA31 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
9 owner reviews
Dry
75
Wet
64
Snow
44
Comfort
74
Treadwear
63
Handling
64

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Kumho Solus TA31 — better wet, dry and snow. Pick the Kumho Sense KR26 if handling matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Solus TA31 leads by 15
A — Kumho Sense KR26
60
B — Kumho Solus TA31
75
Why this score
SourceSense KR26Solus TA31
Tire Rack owners – 85
Tyre Reviews owners 60 74

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Solus TA31 leads by 17
A — Kumho Sense KR26
47
B — Kumho Solus TA31
64
Why this score
SourceSense KR26Solus TA31
Tire Rack owners – 77
Tyre Reviews owners 47 63

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Solus TA31 leads by 14
A — Kumho Sense KR26
30
B — Kumho Solus TA31
44
Why this score
SourceSense KR26Solus TA31
Tire Rack owners – 57
Tyre Reviews owners 30 43

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Solus TA31 leads by 4
A — Kumho Sense KR26
70
B — Kumho Solus TA31
74
Why this score
SourceSense KR26Solus TA31
Tire Rack owners – 78
Tyre Reviews owners 70 73

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Sense KR26
–
B — Kumho Solus TA31
63
Why this score
SourceSense KR26Solus TA31
Tire Rack owners – 78
Tyre Reviews owners – 61

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Sense KR26 leads by 16
A — Kumho Sense KR26
80
B — Kumho Solus TA31
64
Why this score
SourceSense KR26Solus TA31
Tyre Reviews owners 80 64

Scores at a glance

Kumho Sense KR26 vs Kumho Solus TA31: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Sense KR26Kumho Solus TA31
Relative Score 56 64
Dry 60 75
Wet 47 64
Snow 30 44
Comfort 70 74
Treadwear – 63
Handling 80 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Sense KR26

The Kumho Sense KR26 receives a highly critical assessment from this user, who reports significant performance deficiencies in both dry and wet conditions. The tire's lack of traction was severe enough to negatively impact the vehicle's perceived handling and drivetrain behavior, leading to a prompt replacement with a premium alternative.

Cons

  • Extremely poor grip in dry road conditions
  • Complete lack of traction in wet weather
  • Negative impact on vehicle handling and performance characteristics

Observations

  • The user noted that the tire's poor performance caused the vehicle to feel as though it had mechanical issues, specifically regarding engine revving, which was resolved immediately upon switching to a different tire brand.
Tire B Kumho Solus TA31

The Kumho Solus TA31 receives a polarized reception, with users divided between those who value its quiet ride and affordability and those who find its handling and longevity lacking. While some drivers report excellent value and high mileage, others express significant concerns regarding stability during emergency maneuvers and premature tread wear.

Pros

  • Low noise levels and high ride comfort
  • Strong value for money
  • Attractive aesthetic design
  • Reliable performance for conservative, daily driving

Cons

  • Unpredictable handling during emergency maneuvers
  • Concerns regarding premature or uneven tread wear
  • Poor stability control compared to premium competitors
  • Reports of inconsistent tire pressure retention

Observations

  • Users noted that low-profile versions of this tire appear more susceptible to accelerated wear.
  • Front-wheel-drive vehicle owners reported higher-than-average wear rates on the front axle.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Sense KR26 B · Kumho Solus TA31
CategoryAll Season Premium Touring tiresAll Season Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—19
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth—9.5/32″
UTQG—500 A A
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—44 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Kumho

Winner: Kumho Solus TA31 — better wet, dry and snow. Pick the Kumho Sense KR26 if handling matters most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Solus TA31 scores 64 vs 47 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Sense KR26 scores 80 vs 64 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Solus TA31 scores 75 vs 60 on dry.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Solus TA31 scores 44 vs 30 on snow.

Tire A · Kumho Sense KR26
Tire B · Kumho Solus TA31

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.