78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
68/100
3 professional tests
User signal (40%)
84/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Hankook Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 vs Kumho WinterCraft WP71 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
63
/ 100
Objective (60%)
76/100
3 professional tests
User signal (40%)
61/100
17 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 — better noise, comfort and handling. Pick the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 if dry and wet matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
WinterCraft WP71 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 | WinterCraft WP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 59 | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 67 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 96% | 97% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
WinterCraft WP71 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 | WinterCraft WP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 64 | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 61 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 84% | 93% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 97% | 95% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 | WinterCraft WP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 83 | 90 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 96 | 78 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 98% | 99% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 96% | 97% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 leads by 41
Why this score
| Source | Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 | WinterCraft WP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | 51 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 leads by 67
Why this score
| Source | Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 | WinterCraft WP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 77 | 10 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 | WinterCraft WP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 73 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 leads by 29
Why this score
| Source | Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 | WinterCraft WP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 53 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 | Kumho WinterCraft WP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 63 |
| Dry | 71 | 80 |
| Wet | 68 | 73 |
| Snow | 88 | 85 |
| Comfort | 92 | 51 |
| Noise | 77 | 10 |
| Treadwear | 78 | 73 |
| Handling | 82 | 53 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
63
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 96% #13/20 · 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test | 97% #11/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | -1.7 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 98% #2/8 · 2024 Nordic Friction Winter Tyre Test | 92% #5/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | +6.6 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 69% #6/16 · 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test | 63% #3/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | +6.2 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 10% #10/16 · 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test | 14% #7/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | -4.3 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 98% #12/20 · 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test | 99% #3/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | -0.5 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 96% #5/8 · 2024 Nordic Friction Winter Tyre Test | 97% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | -1.1 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 73% #5/8 · 2024 Nordic Friction Winter Tyre Test | 93% #8/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | -20 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 84% #9/16 · 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test | 93% #8/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | -8.7 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 97% #4/20 · 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test | 95% #9/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | +2.4 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that excels in deep snow and provides a comfortable, communicative driving experience. While it offers impressive traction in wintry conditions, users note that its performance is less refined on ice and that the compound is prone to accelerated wear when used in dry, warmer conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and plowing capability in deep snow
- High level of ride comfort and stability during long-distance driving
- Excellent steering feedback and surface communication
- Strong value proposition relative to price
Cons
- Rapid tread wear when driven on dry pavement
- Limited grip and confidence on icy surfaces
- Reduced performance and stability during aggressive driving maneuvers
- Not optimized for regions with infrequent snowfall
Observations
- Users report the tire is well-suited for city driving and daily commuting rather than high-performance or aggressive driving styles.
- The tire's soft compound provides a comfortable ride but necessitates careful driving in dry, non-winter conditions to preserve tread life.
The Kumho WinterCraft WP71 receives a polarized reception, with users frequently praising its competent snow and slush performance while expressing significant dissatisfaction regarding road noise and wet-weather handling. While some drivers find it a capable budget-friendly winter option, others report vague steering feedback and a lack of confidence in cornering, particularly on wet surfaces.
Pros
- Strong traction and braking performance in deep snow and slush
- Competitive price point compared to premium winter tire alternatives
- Predictable handling in dry winter conditions
- Generally satisfactory tread wear longevity
Cons
- Excessive road noise, particularly at low to moderate speeds
- Vague or 'spongy' steering feedback and handling characteristics
- Inconsistent lateral grip and understeer issues on wet roads
- Poor performance on ice compared to premium competitors
Observations
- Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles, such as the Mazda 3 MPS, reported significant handling instability and a lack of precision.
- AWD vehicle owners, such as those with a Kia Sportage, reported higher satisfaction with snow and ice traction than those with FWD setups.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 | B · Kumho WinterCraft WP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring Winter tire | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Hankook
63
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Hankook Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 — better noise, comfort and handling. Pick the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 if dry and wet matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Hankook Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 scores 77 vs 10 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 scores 92 vs 51 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 scores 82 vs 53 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 scores 80 vs 71 on dry.
Tire A · Hankook Winter I*cept iZ2 W616
Tire B · Kumho WinterCraft WP71
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 also compared with
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.