67
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
64/100
1 owner review
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Kumho Ecsta HP4 716 vs Laufenn G FIT AS — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
74/100
20 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Laufenn G FIT AS — better comfort, wet and handling. Pick the Kumho Ecsta HP4 716 if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
G FIT AS leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta HP4 716 | G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 81 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
G FIT AS leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta HP4 716 | G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 65 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta HP4 716 | G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 67 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 54 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
G FIT AS leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta HP4 716 | G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 80 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecsta HP4 716 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta HP4 716 | G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 61 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
G FIT AS leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta HP4 716 | G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 77 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta HP4 716 | Laufenn G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 75 |
| Dry | 80 | 86 |
| Wet | 60 | 72 |
| Snow | – | 67 |
| Comfort | 60 | 85 |
| Noise | – | 91 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 66 |
| Handling | 70 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
67
/ 100
Tire A
75
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The Laufenn G Fit AS is widely regarded as a budget-friendly, entry-level tire that excels in ride comfort and noise reduction for daily commuting. While many users appreciate the value proposition, there is a significant divide regarding wet-weather performance and long-term tread longevity, with some users reporting premature wear and poor traction in rain.
Pros
- Excellent value for the price point
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Good dry weather handling
- Noticeable improvement in fuel efficiency for some users
Cons
- Poor traction and grip in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life failing to meet mileage expectations
- Concerns regarding overall build quality and durability
- Average handling characteristics
Observations
- Users driving smaller, lower-powered vehicles reported significant wheel spin in wet conditions, suggesting limited grip for acceleration.
- Repeat customers noted the tire performs reliably on a variety of mid-sized sedans and crossovers like the Toyota Venza, Camry, and Elantra, provided expectations are set for a budget tire.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta HP4 716 | B · Laufenn G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
67
/ 100
Kumho
75
/ 100
Laufenn
Winner: Laufenn G FIT AS — better comfort, wet and handling. Pick the Kumho Ecsta HP4 716 if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Laufenn G FIT AS scores 85 vs 60 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Laufenn G FIT AS scores 72 vs 60 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn G FIT AS scores 77 vs 70 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Laufenn G FIT AS scores 86 vs 80 on dry.
Tire A · Kumho Ecsta HP4 716
Tire B · Laufenn G FIT AS
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Ecsta HP4 716 also compared with
Laufenn G FIT AS also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.