Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Michelin Defender T+H vs Yokohama AVID Touring — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Michelin

Michelin Defender T+H

Premium Touring All Season tire

Michelin Defender T+H tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
Owner ratings
Dry
94
Wet
91
Snow
76
Comfort
89
Noise
87
Treadwear
90
Handling
92

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama AVID Touring

All Season Touring tires

Yokohama AVID Touring tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
83 owner reviews
Dry
94
Wet
90
Snow
87
Comfort
94
Noise
89
Treadwear
92
Handling
85

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Michelin Defender T+H and Yokohama AVID Touring are within 2 points overall. Michelin Defender T+H is stronger on handling. Yokohama AVID Touring is stronger on snow and comfort.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Michelin Defender T+H
94
B — Yokohama AVID Touring
94
Why this score
SourceDefender T+HAVID Touring
Tire Rack owners 92 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 90

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Defender T+H leads by 1
A — Michelin Defender T+H
91
B — Yokohama AVID Touring
90
Why this score
SourceDefender T+HAVID Touring
Tire Rack owners 88 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 80

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID Touring leads by 11
A — Michelin Defender T+H
76
B — Yokohama AVID Touring
87
Why this score
SourceDefender T+HAVID Touring
Tire Rack owners 73 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID Touring leads by 5
A — Michelin Defender T+H
89
B — Yokohama AVID Touring
94
Why this score
SourceDefender T+HAVID Touring
Tire Rack owners 88 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 100

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID Touring leads by 2
A — Michelin Defender T+H
87
B — Yokohama AVID Touring
89

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) AVID Touring leads by 2
A — Michelin Defender T+H
90
B — Yokohama AVID Touring
92
Why this score
SourceDefender T+HAVID Touring
Tire Rack owners 88 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 85

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Defender T+H leads by 7
A — Michelin Defender T+H
92
B — Yokohama AVID Touring
85
Why this score
SourceDefender T+HAVID Touring
Tyre Reviews owners – 85

Scores at a glance

Michelin Defender T+H vs Yokohama AVID Touring: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Defender T+HYokohama AVID Touring
Relative Score 89 90
Dry 94 94
Wet 91 90
Snow 76 87
Comfort 89 94
Noise 87 89
Treadwear 90 92
Handling 92 85

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Michelin Defender T+H

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Yokohama AVID Touring

The Yokohama AVID Touring is widely regarded as a high-value, reliable tire that offers a comfortable and quiet ride, making it a popular choice for budget-conscious drivers. While most users praise its longevity and consistent performance across various weather conditions, a minority of users report issues with sidewall softness and occasional traction loss in wet conditions.

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Strong tread life and durability
  • Reliable dry and wet road traction for daily commuting
  • Easy to balance during installation

Cons

  • Reports of soft sidewalls leading to handling instability
  • Occasional wheel spin in wet or snowy conditions
  • Some users noted road noise or 'tread growl' over time
  • Tendency to track or follow grooves in pavement

Observations

  • Users with sedans and older passenger cars frequently report that the tire improves ride comfort, making the vehicle feel more stable and substantial.
  • Owners of heavier vehicles or those with specific suspension issues noted that the soft sidewall can be more pronounced, potentially impacting steering precision.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Defender T+H B · Yokohama AVID Touring
CategoryPremium Touring All Season tireAll Season Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin

Yokohama

Too close to call: Michelin Defender T+H and Yokohama AVID Touring are within 2 points overall. Michelin Defender T+H is stronger on handling. Yokohama AVID Touring is stronger on snow and comfort.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama AVID Touring scores 87 vs 76 on snow.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Defender T+H scores 92 vs 85 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama AVID Touring scores 94 vs 89 on comfort.

Tire A · Michelin Defender T+H
Tire B · Yokohama AVID Touring

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.