Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 65 reviews
Michelin Energy Saver+ vs Vredestein T Trac — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Energy Saver+ leads, 71–70 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 3 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Energy Saver+ +268Why this score
Source Energy Saver+ T Trac Reviews found online 71 68 -
70
Wet
T Trac +575Why this score
Source Energy Saver+ T Trac Reviews found online 69 76 -
71
Comfort
Energy Saver+ +269Why this score
Source Energy Saver+ T Trac Reviews found online 72 69 -
73
Treadwear
Energy Saver+ +766Why this score
Source Energy Saver+ T Trac Reviews found online 77 66 -
72
Handling
Energy Saver+ +171Why this score
Source Energy Saver+ T Trac Reviews found online 72 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy Saver+ | Vredestein T Trac |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 70 |
| Dry | 70 | 68 |
| Wet | 70 | 75 |
| Comfort | 71 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 66 |
| Handling | 72 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Energy Saver+
T Trac
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy Saver+
Pros
- Exceptional treadwear and longevity with many users reporting high mileage (30,000 to 60,000+ miles)
- Impressive fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather traction and slippery behavior during cornering or braking in the rain
- Prone to aquaplaning at higher speeds on wet roads
- Tendency to develop sidewall cracking or dry rot as the tires age
Tire B T Trac
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather handling and aquaplaning resistance
- Surprising grip and traction in snow and winter conditions
- High initial comfort levels
Cons
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
- Noticeable decline in comfort and grip as the tire ages
- Underwhelming performance in dry road conditions compared to wet
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy Saver+ | B · Vredestein T Trac |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Energy Saver+
Vredestein T Trac
Too close to call: Michelin Energy Saver+ and Vredestein T Trac are within 2 points overall. Michelin Energy Saver+ is stronger on treadwear. Vredestein T Trac is stronger on wet.
Michelin Energy Saver+ scores 73 vs 66 on treadwear.
Vredestein T Trac scores 75 vs 70 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.