Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Michelin Latitude Tour HP — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 79 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 66 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 64 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 20 | 59 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 76 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 71 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 69 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 67 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | Michelin Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 69 |
| Dry | 80 | 79 |
| Wet | 67 | 67 |
| Snow | 20 | 59 |
| Comfort | 50 | 76 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 69 |
| Handling | 57 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich Advantage T/A receives a polarized reception, with the user highlighting significant concerns regarding the consistency and predictability of the tire compound. While it may offer improved grip levels compared to certain entry-level alternatives, the lack of reliability across varying temperature ranges makes it a difficult recommendation for performance-oriented driving.
Pros
- Improved grip levels compared to baseline tires like the XM2
- Adequate stiffness in cold weather conditions
Cons
- Highly unpredictable compound performance
- Poor heat resistance leading to a 'mushy' feel in hot weather
- Lack of confidence-inspiring grip in cold and wet conditions
Observations
- The XL (Extra Load) variant does not mitigate the fundamental issues with the tire's compound construction.
The Michelin Latitude Tour HP presents a polarized user experience, often praised for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and longevity on specific premium vehicles. However, a significant portion of users report inconsistent tread life, premature sidewall cracking, and disappointing wet-weather performance, leading to a mixed consensus regarding its value proposition.
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry-weather handling and steering response
- High durability and longevity for specific vehicle applications
- Stable and predictable performance on highway driving
Cons
- Premature sidewall cracking and deterioration
- Inconsistent tread life across different vehicle models
- Poor traction and predictability in wet or snowy conditions
- High price point relative to performance longevity
Observations
- Users of the Land Rover Freelander reported significant mechanical issues and vibrations when replacing older Michelin Synchrone tires with the Latitude Tour HP, likely due to diameter differences.
- Owners of premium SUVs like the Porsche Macan generally report high satisfaction with comfort and longevity, whereas owners of mid-market SUVs like the Ford Escape and Honda CR-V frequently report rapid tread wear.
- Some users noted that the tire's performance is highly sensitive to vehicle suspension health, suggesting that perceived handling issues may be exacerbated by worn shock absorbers.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | B · Michelin Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance All Season tire | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 - 680 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Latitude Tour HP — better snow, comfort and handling. Pick the BFGoodrich Advantage T/A if treadwear matters most to you.
Michelin Latitude Tour HP scores 59 vs 20 on snow.
Michelin Latitude Tour HP scores 76 vs 50 on comfort.
Michelin Latitude Tour HP scores 67 vs 57 on handling.
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 75 vs 69 on treadwear.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.