79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
73/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
73/100
38 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
88/100
6 professional tests
User signal (40%)
83/100
13 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV — better comfort, wet and handling. Pick the BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 if noise matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Pilot Alpin 5 SUV leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Pilot Alpin 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | 96 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 91 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 91 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 93% | 100% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 95% | 100% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Pilot Alpin 5 SUV leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Pilot Alpin 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 68 | 86 |
| Tire Rack owners | 90 | 91 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 85 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 97% | 93% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 90% | 100% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Pilot Alpin 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 80 | 79 |
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 82 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 100% | 99% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 100% | 100% |
| Snow Traction (% of best) | 89% | 86% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Pilot Alpin 5 SUV leads by 22
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Pilot Alpin 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 100 |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | 92 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 85 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
All Terrain TA KO2 leads by 56
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Pilot Alpin 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | 44 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Pilot Alpin 5 SUV leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Pilot Alpin 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 85 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Pilot Alpin 5 SUV leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Pilot Alpin 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 87 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 | Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 82 |
| Dry | 82 | 94 |
| Wet | 67 | 86 |
| Snow | 81 | 81 |
| Comfort | 72 | 94 |
| Noise | 100 | 44 |
| Treadwear | 84 | 85 |
| Handling | 72 | 87 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
79
/ 100
Tire A
82
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 77% #5/7 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] | 82% #3/7 · 2023 AMS SUV Winter Tyre Test | -5.4 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% #5/5 · The BEST All Terrain Tyre for 2025 | 100% #1/10 · 2024 AS SUV Winter Tyre Test | -7.3 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 95% #7/7 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] | 100% #1/10 · 2023 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | -4.7 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 75% #7/7 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] | 93% #4/7 · 2023 AMS SUV Winter Tyre Test | -18.5 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 100% #6/7 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] | 94% #1/10 · 2021 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | +5.8 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 14% #7/7 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] | 50% #2/10 · 2021 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | -35.7 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 100% #1/5 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] | 99% #3/10 · 2024 AS SUV Winter Tyre Test | +0.8 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 100% #1/5 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] | 100% #1/10 · 2024 AS SUV Winter Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 89% #3/5 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] | 86% #1/10 · 2024 AS SUV Winter Tyre Test | +3 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 87% #5/7 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] | 99% #2/7 · 2023 AMS SUV Winter Tyre Test | -11.6 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 97% #2/5 · The BEST All Terrain Tyre for 2025 | 93% #5/10 · 2021 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | +3.4 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 90% #6/7 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] | 100% #3/10 · 2024 AS SUV Winter Tyre Test | -10.2 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is widely regarded as a benchmark for off-road durability and rugged versatility, excelling in gravel, sand, and rocky terrain. While users praise its longevity and aggressive aesthetic, there is a consistent consensus regarding its declining performance in wet conditions and increased road noise as the rubber compound hardens over time.
Pros
- Exceptional off-road durability and puncture resistance
- Strong traction in gravel, sand, and rocky terrain
- Long tread life and high mileage capability
- Aggressive, iconic visual appeal
Cons
- Significant loss of wet-weather grip and braking performance
- Increased road noise and harsh ride quality as the tire ages
- Rubber compound tends to harden, negatively impacting cold-weather and wet-surface traction
- Poor performance on ice and hard-packed snow
Observations
- Users with lighter vehicles or vans (e.g., Sprinter) report varying experiences with noise and comfort, often noting that the tire's weight impacts ride quality.
- Owners of heavy-duty 4x4s and trucks frequently highlight the tire's ability to handle high-speed gravel and heavy loads without structural failure.
The Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV is widely regarded as a top-tier winter tire, particularly excelling in wet, slushy, and snowy conditions. Users frequently praise its impressive longevity and balanced performance, though some note a distinct limit to its grip threshold in deep or hard-packed snow compared to dedicated Nordic-style winter tires.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and handling on wet and slushy roads
- High tread life and durability over long distances
- Excellent dry road comfort and low noise levels
- Strong performance in snow-covered cornering and braking
Cons
- Abrupt loss of grip when reaching the limit on hard-packed snow
- Higher price point compared to some competitors
- Performance can feel less predictable than dedicated Nordic winter tires in extreme ice/snow conditions
Observations
- Drivers of heavy SUVs report high confidence in handling and agility, noting the tire makes the vehicle feel more responsive.
- Users transitioning from Nokian tires noted a significant improvement in quietness and dry-road refinement, though some missed the specific snow-traction characteristics of the previous brand.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 | B · Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires | Winter Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 16 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 13 - 15/32″ | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
79
/ 100
BFGoodrich
82
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV — better comfort, wet and handling. Pick the BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 if noise matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 scores 100 vs 44 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV scores 94 vs 72 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV scores 86 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV scores 87 vs 72 on handling.
Tire A · BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 also compared with
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.