Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Hankook Icebear W440 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Icebear W440 | Pilot Alpin 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 96 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 91 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 91 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Icebear W440 | Pilot Alpin 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 86 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 91 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 85 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Icebear W440 | Pilot Alpin 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 79 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 82 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Icebear W440 | Pilot Alpin 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 100 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 92 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 85 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Icebear W440 | Pilot Alpin 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 44 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Icebear W440 | Pilot Alpin 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 85 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Icebear W440 | Pilot Alpin 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 87 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Icebear W440 | Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 88 |
| Dry | 82 | 94 |
| Wet | 86 | 86 |
| Snow | – | 81 |
| Comfort | 88 | 94 |
| Noise | – | 44 |
| Treadwear | 82 | 85 |
| Handling | 78 | 87 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Icebear W440 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that offers impressive performance in snow and ice at a competitive price point. While some users note a necessary break-in period where the tires feel initially slippery, the consensus highlights a significant improvement in traction for rear-wheel-drive vehicles in challenging winter conditions.
Pros
- Excellent traction and confidence on snow and ice
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium brands
- Noticeable performance improvement for rear-wheel-drive vehicles
- Reliable grip on ungritted and steep winter roads
Cons
- Noticeable 'slippery' sensation during the initial 100-mile break-in period
- Performance is strictly categorized as a budget-friendly option rather than a top-tier premium performer
- Mixed feedback on overall refinement compared to more expensive alternatives
Observations
- Users driving rear-wheel-drive platforms, such as the BMW 5 Series and Mazda Eunos, reported a transformative improvement in winter handling.
- The tire is noted for providing sufficient dry and wet grip once the initial break-in phase is complete.
The Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV is widely regarded as a top-tier winter tire, particularly excelling in wet, slushy, and snowy conditions. Users frequently praise its impressive longevity and balanced performance, though some note a distinct limit to its grip threshold in deep or hard-packed snow compared to dedicated Nordic-style winter tires.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and handling on wet and slushy roads
- High tread life and durability over long distances
- Excellent dry road comfort and low noise levels
- Strong performance in snow-covered cornering and braking
Cons
- Abrupt loss of grip when reaching the limit on hard-packed snow
- Higher price point compared to some competitors
- Performance can feel less predictable than dedicated Nordic winter tires in extreme ice/snow conditions
Observations
- Drivers of heavy SUVs report high confidence in handling and agility, noting the tire makes the vehicle feel more responsive.
- Users transitioning from Nokian tires noted a significant improvement in quietness and dry-road refinement, though some missed the specific snow-traction characteristics of the previous brand.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Icebear W440 | B · Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Touring tires | Winter Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV — better dry, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV scores 94 vs 82 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV scores 87 vs 78 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV scores 94 vs 88 on comfort.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV scores 85 vs 82 on treadwear.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.