Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportContact 5 SUV | Pilot Sport 4 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | 90 |
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | 94 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 92 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 100% | 96% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 100% | 100% |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportContact 5 SUV | Pilot Sport 4 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 96 | 95 |
| Tire Rack owners | 70 | 90 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 88 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 99% | 100% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 100% | 100% |
Snow
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportContact 5 SUV | Pilot Sport 4 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 1 |
| Tire Rack owners | 63 | 90 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 72 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportContact 5 SUV | Pilot Sport 4 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 46 | 76 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportContact 5 SUV | Pilot Sport 4 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 42 | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 54 | 71 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportContact 5 SUV | Pilot Sport 4 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 85 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 84 |
| Dry | 95 | 93 |
| Wet | 91 | 94 |
| Snow | 93 | – |
| Comfort | 78 | 38 |
| Noise | 67 | 82 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 90 |
| Handling | 81 | 96 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 100% #1/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 96% #5/6 · 2025 Vi Bilagare Summer EV Tyre Test | +4.3 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #1/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 100% #2/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +0.1 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 98% #2/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 86% #6/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | +12.7 | Different tests |
| Grass Traction | Grass | 89% #6/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 71% #4/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | +17.7 | Different tests |
| Gravel Handling | Gravel | 100% #2/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 97% #9/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | +2.9 | Different tests |
| Gravel Traction | Gravel | 96% #3/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 95% #2/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | +1.2 | Different tests |
| Mud Traction | Mud | 82% #7/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 94% #3/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | -12.1 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 96% #4/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 99% #8/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | -3.1 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 100% #7/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 100% #10/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 100% #1/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 96% #6/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 100% #1/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | -4.4 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 99% #2/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | -0.8 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% #1/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV is widely praised for its high-performance handling, superior wet and dry grip, and refined ride comfort. However, a significant portion of the user base reports dissatisfaction regarding rapid tread wear, with many owners of mid-to-large SUVs experiencing premature replacement intervals.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry braking performance
- High levels of steering precision and handling confidence
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong traction and stability during spirited driving
Cons
- Rapid tread wear, particularly on heavier SUV models
- High price point relative to the total mileage achieved
- Increased road noise as the tread wears down
- Soft rubber compound prone to puncture damage
Observations
- Owners of mid-size SUVs like the Hyundai Tucson, VW Tiguan, and Ford Edge frequently report premature wear, often requiring replacement under 15,000 miles.
- High-performance vehicle owners (e.g., BMW X5) report better longevity and satisfaction, suggesting the tire performs best when matched with specific high-performance chassis tuning.
- Run-flat variants are noted for a firmer ride and increased noise compared to standard versions.
The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV is widely regarded as a premium, high-performance tire that significantly improves ride quality and handling dynamics, particularly when replacing harsh OEM run-flat tires. While users consistently praise its exceptional wet-weather grip and confident dry-road handling, the consensus is tempered by reports of rapid tread wear and elevated road noise in certain applications.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance.
- Significant improvement in ride comfort and steering feel compared to OEM run-flats.
- Predictable and progressive handling at the limit.
- Strong dry-road grip and braking performance.
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear, particularly on heavy or high-torque vehicles.
- Increased road noise reported by some users, especially as the tire wears.
- Higher price point compared to competitors.
- Noticeable reduction in fuel economy or EV range due to rolling resistance.
Observations
- EV owners (notably Tesla Model Y/3) report a measurable decrease in range (approx. 10-20%) compared to OEM efficiency-focused tires.
- Users transitioning from factory-fitted run-flat tires on luxury SUVs (BMW X3, Mercedes GLC) report the most significant satisfaction regarding ride compliance and noise reduction.
- Heavy, high-torque SUVs and performance vehicles experience accelerated tread wear, with some users reporting significant degradation under 20,000 miles.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV is widely regarded as a high-performance tire option for luxury and sport utility vehicles, often compared against alternatives like Pirelli Scorpions and Michelin's own Latitude series. Users appreciate its strong grip and dynamic capabilities, though questions regarding tread wear, run-flat options, and comparisons with all-season variants are common.
“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”
“I'm leaning towards the Pilot Sport 4 SUV over the LS3. I'd really like to see how much better these tires grip. Although it sounds like I'll be sacrificing a little comfort, but with air suspension I'm not too worried.”
“Nope nope nope. I live in the SE and my RWD sports car get squirrelly with normal driving when it drops below 40 on my PS4Ss. You’d be in a ditch first bit of snow.”
“Used Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV I am looking to buy these used Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires. They have 7+ mm thread left, DOT 0923. I am wondering why the two tires on the right are so rough / full of small holes, while the ones on the left are so smooth. Probably the right ones were on the front, but still what could this condition be indicating? I still haven't been to the shop to see them and feel how is the rubber, wanted to hear an advice first.”
Based on 9 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV | B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — better treadwear, noise and handling. Pick the Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV if comfort matters most to you.
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV scores 78 vs 38 on comfort.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 90 vs 65 on treadwear.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 82 vs 67 on noise.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 96 vs 81 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.