81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
73/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
78/100
53 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
4 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
60 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV — better dry, snow and comfort. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 if noise and treadwear matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ContiSportContact 5 SUV leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportContact 5 SUV | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | 68 |
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 100% | 92% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 100% | 98% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ContiSportContact 5 SUV leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportContact 5 SUV | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 96 | 80 |
| Tire Rack owners | 70 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 81 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 99% | 83% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 100% | 99% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
ContiSportContact 5 SUV leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportContact 5 SUV | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ContiSportContact 5 SUV leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportContact 5 SUV | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 56 |
| Tire Rack owners | 63 | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 77 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 97 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportContact 5 SUV | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 46 | 93 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportContact 5 SUV | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 42 | 69 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 54 | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportContact 5 SUV | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 83 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV | Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 79 |
| Dry | 95 | 77 |
| Wet | 91 | 81 |
| Snow | 93 | 80 |
| Comfort | 78 | 65 |
| Noise | 67 | 92 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 77 |
| Handling | 81 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
81
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 100% #1/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 92% #8/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | +8.1 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #1/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 98% #5/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | +1.8 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 98% #2/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 85% #10/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | +13.8 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 96% #4/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 100% #15/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | -3.6 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 100% #7/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 68% #6/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | +31.8 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 100% #1/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 4% #26/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test | +96.2 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 96% #6/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 94% #4/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | +1.2 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 99% #2/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 83% #29/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test | +16.5 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% #1/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 99% #4/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | +1.4 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV is widely praised for its high-performance handling, superior wet and dry grip, and refined ride comfort. However, a significant portion of the user base reports dissatisfaction regarding rapid tread wear, with many owners of mid-to-large SUVs experiencing premature replacement intervals.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry braking performance
- High levels of steering precision and handling confidence
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong traction and stability during spirited driving
Cons
- Rapid tread wear, particularly on heavier SUV models
- High price point relative to the total mileage achieved
- Increased road noise as the tread wears down
- Soft rubber compound prone to puncture damage
Observations
- Owners of mid-size SUVs like the Hyundai Tucson, VW Tiguan, and Ford Edge frequently report premature wear, often requiring replacement under 15,000 miles.
- High-performance vehicle owners (e.g., BMW X5) report better longevity and satisfaction, suggesting the tire performs best when matched with specific high-performance chassis tuning.
- Run-flat variants are noted for a firmer ride and increased noise compared to standard versions.
The Yokohama Advan Sport V105 is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that excels in dry handling, steering responsiveness, and wet-weather confidence. While many users praise its balanced nature and value compared to premium rivals, some report concerns regarding tread longevity and noise levels, particularly as the tires age.
Pros
- Excellent dry road grip and cornering stability
- Strong wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- High level of steering feedback and turn-in precision
- Competitive pricing compared to other flagship performance brands
- Predictable handling characteristics at the limit
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear, especially under spirited driving
- Increased road noise reported by some users
- Performance drop-off in freezing temperatures and snow
- Occasional 'flat-spotting' or vibration after the vehicle has been stationary for extended periods
Observations
- Owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 report excellent handling balance and longevity, often citing the tire as an ideal OE-style replacement.
- Drivers of high-torque, rear-wheel-drive sedans (e.g., BMW 5-series, Audi S4) note that while grip is impressive, rear tire wear is significantly accelerated compared to front tires.
- Some users with larger luxury sedans noted that the tire's 'firm' construction can lead to a harsher ride over small road imperfections.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV | B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 10 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 240 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
81
/ 100
Continental
79
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV — better dry, snow and comfort. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 if noise and treadwear matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 92 vs 67 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV scores 95 vs 77 on dry.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV scores 93 vs 80 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV scores 78 vs 65 on comfort.
Tire A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV also compared with
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.