92
/ 100
Objective (60%)
77/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
94/100
1,994 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect vs Nexen N FERA SUR4G — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
70
/ 100
Objective (60%)
74/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
72/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect — better comfort, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect | N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 92 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 94 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 99% | 94% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 99% | 100% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect | N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 86 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 84 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 92% | 96% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect leads by 46
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect | N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 48 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect | N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect leads by 44
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect | N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 46 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect | N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 83 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect | Nexen N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 92 | 70 |
| Dry | 94 | 90 |
| Wet | 88 | 86 |
| Comfort | 94 | 48 |
| Noise | 97 | – |
| Treadwear | 90 | 46 |
| Handling | 96 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
92
/ 100
Tire A
70
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 99% #9/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test | 94% #3/3 · 2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test | +4.7 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #3/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test | 100% #3/3 · 2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test | -1 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 11% #9/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test | 33% #3/3 · 2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test | -22.2 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 92% #8/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test | 96% #2/3 · 2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test | -3.7 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect is widely regarded as a premier track-focused tire that offers a sophisticated balance between extreme dry-weather performance and surprising street-legal usability. While users praise its exceptional grip, communicative feedback, and heat tolerance during high-performance driving, it remains a specialized product that demands careful management of expectations regarding tread life and wet-weather limitations.
Pros
- Exceptional dry traction and consistent performance during track sessions.
- Improved heat tolerance and durability compared to previous generation track tires.
- Surprisingly high levels of comfort and lower noise levels for a tire in this performance category.
- Predictable and progressive breakaway characteristics at the limit.
- Stronger wet-weather performance than traditional track-only rubber.
Cons
- Rapid tread wear, particularly when subjected to aggressive track use.
- High price point, compounded by the additional cost of the optional Track Connect sensor kit.
- Sticky compound prone to picking up road debris and throwing it against the vehicle body.
- Performance significantly degrades as the tire approaches the wear bars.
- Not suitable for cold weather or heavy snow conditions.
Observations
- Users noted that vehicle-specific OE specifications (e.g., Porsche vs. BMW vs. standard) can result in noticeable differences in steering feel and grip levels.
- Drivers of lighter, agile platforms (like the Honda Fit or Subaru) reported excellent rotation and track performance, while heavier vehicles may experience faster shoulder wear.
- The 'Connect' system compatibility varies by vehicle, with some users reporting difficulty integrating the sensor kit with non-supported car models.
The Nexen N Fera SUR4G is widely regarded as a high-performance track-focused tire that delivers exceptional dry grip at a competitive price point. While users praise its track capabilities and surprising wet-weather performance, the tire is noted for its rapid tread wear, making it better suited for dedicated track use than daily driving.
Pros
- Exceptional dry track grip
- Competitive pricing compared to rivals like the Hankook RS4
- Surprisingly capable performance in wet conditions
- Consistent performance during track events
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Not ideal for high-mileage daily driving
- Performance drops off significantly as the tire wears
Observations
- Users report the tire is highly effective for competitive track events and racing scenarios.
- The tire's longevity is significantly impacted by frequent track usage, with some users cycling through multiple sets per season.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect | B · Nexen N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Trackday and Competition tires | Summer Extreme Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
92
/ 100
Michelin
70
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect — better comfort, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect scores 94 vs 48 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect scores 90 vs 46 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect scores 96 vs 83 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect scores 94 vs 90 on dry.
Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect
Tire B · Nexen N FERA SUR4G
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect also compared with
Nexen N FERA SUR4G also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.