73
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
76/100
160 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Nexen N Fera SU1 vs Nexen N FERA SUR4G — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
70
/ 100
Objective (60%)
74/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
72/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen N Fera SU1 — better treadwear and comfort. Pick the Nexen N FERA SUR4G if dry, handling and wet matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
N FERA SUR4G leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 75 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 94 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 89% | 94% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 98% | 100% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
N FERA SUR4G leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 84 |
| SimpleTire owners | 89 | – |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 87% | 96% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 78 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU1 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 40 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 48 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU1 leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 46 |
| SimpleTire owners | 87 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
N FERA SUR4G leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 83 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Fera SU1 | Nexen N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 70 |
| Dry | 78 | 90 |
| Wet | 81 | 86 |
| Snow | 76 | – |
| Comfort | 56 | 48 |
| Noise | 87 | – |
| Treadwear | 72 | 46 |
| Handling | 75 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
Tire A
70
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 89% #10/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 94% #3/3 · 2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test | -4.7 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 100% #3/3 · 2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test | -1.7 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 10% #10/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 33% #3/3 · 2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test | -23.3 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 87% #10/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 96% #2/3 · 2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test | -8.8 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Nexen N Fera SU1 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range summer tire that frequently punches above its weight class, often compared favorably to premium brands like Continental and Michelin. While most users praise its exceptional comfort, low noise levels, and reliable wet/dry grip, a notable segment of reviewers reports concerns regarding premature sidewall cracking and soft sidewall construction that can impact handling precision on heavier or performance-oriented vehicles.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- Very low road noise and high ride comfort
- Strong wet and dry traction for daily driving
- Predictable handling characteristics for standard road use
Cons
- Reports of premature sidewall cracking and tread block degradation
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feel or instability on heavy vehicles
- Performance drop-off noted as tread depth decreases
- Not suitable for winter conditions despite occasional mislabeling
Observations
- Owners of heavier vehicles (e.g., SUVs, EVs, or large sedans) frequently report that the soft sidewalls lead to a 'floating' sensation or lack of cornering confidence.
- Users replacing factory-fitted run-flat tires on BMWs and other luxury vehicles consistently report significant improvements in ride comfort and noise reduction.
- Performance-oriented drivers note that the tire lacks the necessary rigidity for track use or aggressive spirited driving compared to dedicated UHP tires.
The Nexen N Fera SUR4G is widely regarded as a high-performance track-focused tire that delivers exceptional dry grip at a competitive price point. While users praise its track capabilities and surprising wet-weather performance, the tire is noted for its rapid tread wear, making it better suited for dedicated track use than daily driving.
Pros
- Exceptional dry track grip
- Competitive pricing compared to rivals like the Hankook RS4
- Surprisingly capable performance in wet conditions
- Consistent performance during track events
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Not ideal for high-mileage daily driving
- Performance drops off significantly as the tire wears
Observations
- Users report the tire is highly effective for competitive track events and racing scenarios.
- The tire's longevity is significantly impacted by frequent track usage, with some users cycling through multiple sets per season.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Fera SU1 | B · Nexen N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Extreme Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 58 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 24″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 300 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 25,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
Nexen
70
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU1 — better treadwear and comfort. Pick the Nexen N FERA SUR4G if dry, handling and wet matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 72 vs 46 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N FERA SUR4G scores 90 vs 78 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 56 vs 48 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen N FERA SUR4G scores 83 vs 75 on handling.
Tire A · Nexen N Fera SU1
Tire B · Nexen N FERA SUR4G
More comparisons
Also compared with
Nexen N Fera SU1 also compared with
Nexen N FERA SUR4G also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.