84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Pilot Super Sport ZP vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
64
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
63/100
45 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Pilot Super Sport ZP — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Pilot Super Sport ZP leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Super Sport ZP | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 96 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Pilot Super Sport ZP leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Super Sport ZP | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 66 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Pilot Super Sport ZP leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Super Sport ZP | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 50 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Super Sport ZP | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Pilot Super Sport ZP leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Super Sport ZP | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 79 | 66 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 47 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 60 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Pilot Super Sport ZP leads by 31
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Super Sport ZP | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 65 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Super Sport ZP | Yokohama ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 84 | 64 |
| Dry | 96 | 79 |
| Wet | 79 | 70 |
| Comfort | 81 | 57 |
| Noise | 79 | – |
| Treadwear | 78 | 52 |
| Handling | 96 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
84
/ 100
Tire A
64
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The Yokohama ADVAN Sport is a polarizing high-performance tire that receives widely divergent feedback from users. While some drivers praise its sharp steering response, predictable feedback, and dry-weather grip, a significant portion of the user base reports severe dissatisfaction regarding excessive road noise, rapid tread wear, and inconsistent performance in wet conditions.
Pros
- Excellent steering response and road feedback
- Strong dry-weather grip and cornering stability
- Predictable handling characteristics when pushed to the limit
- High value for money when purchased at discounted or clearance pricing
Cons
- Excessive and intrusive road noise
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance and aquaplaning concerns
- Harsh ride quality compared to premium competitors
Observations
- Users with luxury sedans (e.g., Audi A7, Volvo S60) frequently cited the tire as being too noisy and harsh for daily commuting.
- Owners of performance-oriented vehicles noted that while the tire performs well on the track, it often fails to meet longevity expectations for daily driving.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque setups reported faster-than-average tread degradation.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Super Sport ZP | B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 180 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
84
/ 100
Michelin
64
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Michelin Pilot Super Sport ZP — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Pilot Super Sport ZP scores 96 vs 65 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Pilot Super Sport ZP scores 78 vs 52 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Pilot Super Sport ZP scores 81 vs 57 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Pilot Super Sport ZP scores 96 vs 79 on dry.
Tire A · Michelin Pilot Super Sport ZP
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Pilot Super Sport ZP also compared with
Yokohama ADVAN Sport also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.