69
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
62/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Energy MXV4+ vs Michelin Premier LTX — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
77
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
63/100
1 owner review
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Premier LTX — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Michelin Energy MXV4+ if treadwear and comfort matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Premier LTX leads by 30
Why this score
| Source | Energy MXV4+ | Premier LTX |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Premier LTX leads by 30
Why this score
| Source | Energy MXV4+ | Premier LTX |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 53 | 80 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Energy MXV4+ | Premier LTX |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 71 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 70 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Energy MXV4+ leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Energy MXV4+ | Premier LTX |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 98 | 90 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Energy MXV4+ leads by 33
Why this score
| Source | Energy MXV4+ | Premier LTX |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 53 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 60 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Premier LTX leads by 37
Why this score
| Source | Energy MXV4+ | Premier LTX |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 43 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy MXV4+ | Michelin Premier LTX |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 77 |
| Dry | 55 | 85 |
| Wet | 53 | 83 |
| Snow | – | 71 |
| Comfort | 98 | 88 |
| Treadwear | 90 | 57 |
| Handling | 43 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Tire A
77
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Energy MXV4+ is widely regarded as a comfort-oriented touring tire that excels in noise reduction and ride quality. While it is praised by some for its longevity and value as an OEM replacement, others report significant performance limitations, particularly regarding steering feedback and traction in high-temperature or high-speed conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and cabin quietness
- High tread longevity and durability
- Strong value proposition as an OEM-style replacement
Cons
- Poor steering response and handling precision
- Degraded wet weather performance as the tread wears
- Instability and vibration issues at higher highway speeds
- Reduced traction in high-temperature environments
Observations
- Users noted that the tire's comfort-focused design is well-suited for mild, daily driving but becomes unsettling on larger or heavier vehicles at speeds exceeding 120km/h.
- Owners of mid-size sedans, such as the Subaru Legacy, reported a positive experience when using the tire as an upgrade from standard factory equipment.
The Michelin Premier LTX is generally regarded as a high-performing tire that offers a refined driving experience. However, users express significant concern regarding the initial tread depth, which many feel limits the tire's overall longevity and value proposition.
Pros
- High levels of overall performance and handling
- Strong brand reputation for quality and engineering
- Comfortable and refined ride characteristics
Cons
- Insufficient initial tread depth
- Concerns regarding premature tread wear
- Perceived lack of value due to limited lifespan
Observations
- Users suggest that the tire's performance potential is hampered specifically by the shallow tread design regardless of vehicle application.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy MXV4+ | B · Michelin Premier LTX |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Michelin
77
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Premier LTX — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Michelin Energy MXV4+ if treadwear and comfort matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Premier LTX scores 80 vs 43 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Energy MXV4+ scores 90 vs 57 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Premier LTX scores 85 vs 55 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Premier LTX scores 83 vs 53 on wet.
Tire A · Michelin Energy MXV4+
Tire B · Michelin Premier LTX
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Energy MXV4+ also compared with
Michelin Premier LTX also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.