69
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
62/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Energy MXV4+ vs Yokohama AVID Ascend — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
90
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
23 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better dry, wet and handling. Pick the Michelin Energy MXV4+ if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 40
Why this score
| Source | Energy MXV4+ | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 40
Why this score
| Source | Energy MXV4+ | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 53 | 80 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Energy MXV4+ | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Energy MXV4+ leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Energy MXV4+ | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 98 | 70 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Energy MXV4+ | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 95 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 37
Why this score
| Source | Energy MXV4+ | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 43 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy MXV4+ | Yokohama AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 90 |
| Dry | 55 | 95 |
| Wet | 53 | 93 |
| Snow | – | 85 |
| Comfort | 98 | 89 |
| Noise | – | 88 |
| Treadwear | 90 | 90 |
| Handling | 43 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Tire A
90
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Energy MXV4+ is widely regarded as a comfort-oriented touring tire that excels in noise reduction and ride quality. While it is praised by some for its longevity and value as an OEM replacement, others report significant performance limitations, particularly regarding steering feedback and traction in high-temperature or high-speed conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and cabin quietness
- High tread longevity and durability
- Strong value proposition as an OEM-style replacement
Cons
- Poor steering response and handling precision
- Degraded wet weather performance as the tread wears
- Instability and vibration issues at higher highway speeds
- Reduced traction in high-temperature environments
Observations
- Users noted that the tire's comfort-focused design is well-suited for mild, daily driving but becomes unsettling on larger or heavier vehicles at speeds exceeding 120km/h.
- Owners of mid-size sedans, such as the Subaru Legacy, reported a positive experience when using the tire as an upgrade from standard factory equipment.
The Yokohama Avid Ascend is widely regarded as a high-value, all-season tire that excels in wet weather performance and ride comfort. While most users report significant improvements in traction and noise levels compared to factory-installed tires, a small subset of owners has raised concerns regarding premature tread wear and occasional manufacturing defects.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
- Smooth and quiet ride quality
- Reliable handling in light snow and slushy conditions
Cons
- Reports of premature or uneven tread wear in some instances
- Occasional noise issues on dry pavement
- Isolated reports of tires going out of round after moderate mileage
Observations
- Subaru Forester owners frequently cite these as a superior upgrade for both comfort and all-weather capability.
- Users of AWD vehicles, including the Audi A4 and Toyota Sienna, report high satisfaction with the tire's handling in mixed precipitation.
- Hybrid vehicle owners noted that the tire maintains fuel efficiency comparable to factory specifications.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy MXV4+ | B · Yokohama AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 12/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 740 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 75,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Michelin
90
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better dry, wet and handling. Pick the Michelin Energy MXV4+ if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 95 vs 55 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 93 vs 53 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 80 vs 43 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Energy MXV4+ scores 98 vs 89 on comfort.
Tire A · Michelin Energy MXV4+
Tire B · Yokohama AVID Ascend
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Energy MXV4+ also compared with
Yokohama AVID Ascend also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.