72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
63/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Primacy MXM4 vs Nexen CP671 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen CP671 — better comfort, handling and dry. Pick the Michelin Primacy MXM4 if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
CP671 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 94 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
CP671 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 75 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 60 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 82 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
CP671 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Primacy MXM4 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 73 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 70 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 89 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
CP671 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Primacy MXM4 | Nexen CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 78 |
| Dry | 77 | 85 |
| Wet | 70 | 75 |
| Snow | 51 | – |
| Comfort | 66 | 85 |
| Treadwear | 79 | 70 |
| Handling | 64 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Tire A
78
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Primacy MXM4 is generally regarded as a comfort-oriented grand touring tire that excels in ride quality and tread longevity but falls short for performance-minded drivers. While users praise its ability to dampen road vibrations and maintain durability, many report lackluster handling, significant understeer, and underwhelming wet-weather traction when pushed.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and vibration dampening
- Strong tread life and durability
- High fuel efficiency
- Effective resistance to aquaplaning in heavy rain
Cons
- Mediocre dry grip and handling precision
- Noticeable understeer when cornering
- Soft sidewalls that lack steering feedback
- Increased road noise on certain surfaces
Observations
- Drivers of high-torque FWD vehicles report significant wheelspin and traction issues in wet conditions.
- Tesla Model 3 owners noted a decline in handling performance compared to dedicated summer tires, suggesting the tire is better suited for comfort than spirited driving.
- The tire's run-flat variants are noted for maintaining a surprisingly soft and compliant ride despite their reinforced construction.
The Nexen CP671 is generally regarded as a durable, budget-friendly tire that offers reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions. While users appreciate its longevity and consistent handling, the experience is often tempered by noticeable road noise and structural aging issues over time.
Pros
- Impressive tread longevity and lifespan
- Reliable traction in both wet and dry weather
- Predictable and stable handling characteristics
Cons
- Significant road noise and cabin roar
- Directional tread pattern complicates tire rotation
- Tendency for rubber cracking as the tire ages
Observations
- Demonstrated strong durability on compact diesel vehicles, achieving 30,000 miles with remaining tread depth.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Primacy MXM4 | B · Nexen CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 12 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 400 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 36 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Michelin
78
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Nexen CP671 — better comfort, handling and dry. Pick the Michelin Primacy MXM4 if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen CP671 scores 85 vs 66 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen CP671 scores 80 vs 64 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Primacy MXM4 scores 79 vs 70 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen CP671 scores 85 vs 77 on dry.
Tire A · Michelin Primacy MXM4
Tire B · Nexen CP671
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Primacy MXM4 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.