90
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
90/100
1 owner review
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Michelin XAS vs Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
73/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
93/100
67 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Michelin XAS and Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain are within 2 points overall. Michelin XAS is stronger on comfort.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Scorpion All Terrain leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | XAS | Scorpion All Terrain |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
XAS leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | XAS | Scorpion All Terrain |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | XAS | Scorpion All Terrain |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 45 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
XAS leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | XAS | Scorpion All Terrain |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | XAS | Scorpion All Terrain |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 100 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Scorpion All Terrain leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | XAS | Scorpion All Terrain |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin XAS | Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 90 | 89 |
| Dry | 90 | 91 |
| Wet | 90 | 88 |
| Snow | – | 64 |
| Comfort | 90 | 84 |
| Noise | – | 95 |
| Treadwear | 90 | 92 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
90
/ 100
Tire A
89
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin XAS is highly regarded as a dependable, classic radial tire that maintains its reputation for reliability and performance in vintage applications. Users consistently praise its quiet operation and balanced grip across various road conditions, reflecting its historical status as a premium choice for classic vehicles.
Pros
- Excellent reliability and durability over long-term use
- Quiet operation across a variety of speeds and surfaces
- Consistent grip performance on both wet and dry tarmac
- Proven track record for heavy-load applications like towing
Cons
- Limited availability of specific vintage sizes
- Higher price point associated with the Michelin Classic line
Observations
- Proven capability for heavy-load scenarios, including towing caravans and fully loaded family vehicles.
- Highly regarded for use on classic family sedans and estate cars from the 1980s era.
The Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus is widely regarded as a high-performing, versatile tire that successfully balances aggressive off-road aesthetics and capability with refined on-road manners. Users frequently praise its exceptional wet and winter weather traction, noting that it remains surprisingly quiet and comfortable for its category, often positioning it as a superior alternative to more common industry competitors.
Pros
- Excellent traction in snow, ice, and wet conditions
- Surprisingly low road noise for an all-terrain tread pattern
- Strong off-road performance in mud and loose gravel
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
- Aggressive, aesthetically pleasing sidewall and tread design
Cons
- Occasional reports of difficult balancing or persistent vibrations
- Some users noted a slight decrease in fuel economy
- Minor instances of tread chipping or cutting under heavy use
- Inconsistent ride comfort reported by a small minority of users
Observations
- Users with full-size trucks and SUVs (e.g., Silverado, Suburban, Tundra) frequently highlight the tire's ability to maintain a quiet cabin during long-distance highway driving.
- Owners of off-road-oriented vehicles like the Jeep Wrangler and Nissan Xterra report significant improvements in handling and confidence compared to stock or dedicated mud-terrain tires.
- One user noted a significant installation challenge when attempting to fit R16 tires onto 18-inch rims, emphasizing the importance of correct sizing.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin XAS | B · Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | All Terrain and Off Road All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
90
/ 100
Michelin
89
/ 100
Pirelli
Too close to call: Michelin XAS and Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain are within 2 points overall. Michelin XAS is stronger on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin XAS scores 90 vs 84 on comfort.
Tire A · Michelin XAS
Tire B · Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin XAS also compared with
Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.