72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
63/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Michelin Primacy MXM4 vs Nexen N FERA RU1 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
71/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
75/100
25 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen N FERA RU1 — better comfort, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
N FERA RU1 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 81 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 82 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
N FERA RU1 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 82 |
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 75 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 60 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
N FERA RU1 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 76 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 74 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Primacy MXM4 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 73 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 78 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
N FERA RU1 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 71 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Primacy MXM4 | Nexen N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 78 |
| Dry | 77 | 82 |
| Wet | 70 | 79 |
| Snow | 51 | – |
| Comfort | 66 | 76 |
| Noise | – | 74 |
| Treadwear | 79 | 78 |
| Handling | 64 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Tire A
78
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Primacy MXM4 is generally regarded as a comfort-oriented grand touring tire that excels in ride quality and tread longevity but falls short for performance-minded drivers. While users praise its ability to dampen road vibrations and maintain durability, many report lackluster handling, significant understeer, and underwhelming wet-weather traction when pushed.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and vibration dampening
- Strong tread life and durability
- High fuel efficiency
- Effective resistance to aquaplaning in heavy rain
Cons
- Mediocre dry grip and handling precision
- Noticeable understeer when cornering
- Soft sidewalls that lack steering feedback
- Increased road noise on certain surfaces
Observations
- Drivers of high-torque FWD vehicles report significant wheelspin and traction issues in wet conditions.
- Tesla Model 3 owners noted a decline in handling performance compared to dedicated summer tires, suggesting the tire is better suited for comfort than spirited driving.
- The tire's run-flat variants are noted for maintaining a surprisingly soft and compliant ride despite their reinforced construction.
The Nexen N Fera RU1 is widely regarded as a high-value touring tire that excels in ride comfort and noise reduction, often outperforming more expensive premium brands in these categories. While many users report excellent longevity and wet/dry grip, a subset of owners experiences inconsistent performance, particularly regarding tread wear and high-speed stability on specific vehicle platforms.
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Superior ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong wet and dry traction for daily driving
- Impressive tread life for many users
Cons
- Inconsistent tread wear, with some reports of premature chipping or rapid degradation
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback or vibrations at highway speeds
- Performance drop-off in colder temperatures or wet conditions for some users
- Lack of responsiveness during aggressive or high-speed maneuvers
Observations
- SUV owners (e.g., Volvo XC90, VW Tiguan) generally praise the comfort and longevity, though some report concerns with emergency handling.
- Users on larger rim sizes (e.g., 20-inch) have reported specific issues with sidewall flex and vibration that were not present on smaller, higher-profile sizes.
- Performance on modern EVs (e.g., Kia EV6) appears polarized, with some users finding the handling characteristics unsuitable for the vehicle's dynamics.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Primacy MXM4 | B · Nexen N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Michelin
78
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Nexen N FERA RU1 — better comfort, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N FERA RU1 scores 76 vs 66 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N FERA RU1 scores 79 vs 70 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen N FERA RU1 scores 71 vs 64 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N FERA RU1 scores 82 vs 77 on dry.
Tire A · Michelin Primacy MXM4
Tire B · Nexen N FERA RU1
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Primacy MXM4 also compared with
Nexen N FERA RU1 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.