Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2 vs Nexen N Fera RU5 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Cooper

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2

Touring Winter tire

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
Owner ratings
Dry
76
Wet
77
Snow
–
Comfort
73
Noise
–
Treadwear
80
Handling
77

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Nexen

Nexen N Fera RU5

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Nexen N Fera RU5 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
90/100
18 owner reviews
Dry
91
Wet
88
Snow
76
Comfort
92
Noise
91
Treadwear
87
Handling
83

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Nexen N Fera RU5 — better comfort, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) N Fera RU5 leads by 15
A — Cooper WeatherMaster SA2
76
B — Nexen N Fera RU5
91
Why this score
SourceWeatherMaster SA2N Fera RU5
Tyre Reviews owners – 87

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) N Fera RU5 leads by 11
A — Cooper WeatherMaster SA2
77
B — Nexen N Fera RU5
88
Why this score
SourceWeatherMaster SA2N Fera RU5
Tyre Reviews owners – 87

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Cooper WeatherMaster SA2
–
B — Nexen N Fera RU5
76

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) N Fera RU5 leads by 19
A — Cooper WeatherMaster SA2
73
B — Nexen N Fera RU5
92
Why this score
SourceWeatherMaster SA2N Fera RU5
Tyre Reviews owners – 97

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Cooper WeatherMaster SA2
–
B — Nexen N Fera RU5
91

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) N Fera RU5 leads by 7
A — Cooper WeatherMaster SA2
80
B — Nexen N Fera RU5
87
Why this score
SourceWeatherMaster SA2N Fera RU5
Tyre Reviews owners – 90

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) N Fera RU5 leads by 6
A — Cooper WeatherMaster SA2
77
B — Nexen N Fera RU5
83
Why this score
SourceWeatherMaster SA2N Fera RU5
Tyre Reviews owners – 83

Scores at a glance

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2 vs Nexen N Fera RU5: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryCooper WeatherMaster SA2Nexen N Fera RU5
Relative Score 77 88
Dry 76 91
Wet 77 88
Snow – 76
Comfort 73 92
Noise – 91
Treadwear 80 87
Handling 77 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Cooper WeatherMaster SA2

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Nexen N Fera RU5

The Nexen N'Fera RU5 is widely regarded as a high-value tire that delivers performance comparable to premium brands at a significantly lower price point. While most users praise its wet-weather traction, longevity, and comfort, there is a notable divide regarding its winter capabilities, with some users reporting poor performance in snow.

Pros

  • Exceptional value for the price compared to premium competitors
  • Strong wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • Impressive tread life and durability
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Inconsistent performance in snow and icy conditions
  • Potential for flat-spotting in cold temperatures
  • Marketed as all-season but perceived by some as better suited for summer/wet climates

Observations

  • Users on larger 20-inch wheels reported a significant improvement in noise levels and comfort compared to factory-fitted performance tires.
  • The tire demonstrates high durability on front-wheel-drive configurations, with some users reporting significantly higher mileage compared to other performance-oriented brands.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Cooper WeatherMaster SA2 B · Nexen N Fera RU5
CategoryTouring Winter tireSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Cooper

Nexen

Winner: Nexen N Fera RU5 — better comfort, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N Fera RU5 scores 92 vs 73 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen N Fera RU5 scores 91 vs 76 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N Fera RU5 scores 88 vs 77 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen N Fera RU5 scores 87 vs 80 on treadwear.

Tire A · Cooper WeatherMaster SA2
Tire B · Nexen N Fera RU5

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.