84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
94 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Nexen N Fera SU4 vs Vredestein Quatrac 3 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
49 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better comfort, dry and treadwear. Pick the Vredestein Quatrac 3 if snow matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU4 | Quatrac 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 81 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU4 | Quatrac 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 86 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Quatrac 3 leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU4 | Quatrac 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 100 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU4 | Quatrac 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 77 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU4 | Quatrac 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 76 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU4 | Quatrac 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 76 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 84 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Fera SU4 | Vredestein Quatrac 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 84 | 82 |
| Dry | 91 | 81 |
| Wet | 87 | 86 |
| Snow | 76 | 100 |
| Comfort | 88 | 77 |
| Noise | 91 | – |
| Treadwear | 82 | 76 |
| Handling | 80 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
84
/ 100
Tire A
82
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Nexen N Fera SU4 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly summer tire that punches well above its price point. Users consistently praise its impressive wet and dry traction, low noise levels, and superior ride comfort compared to more expensive premium brands. While it is not a dedicated track tire, it serves as an excellent daily driver option for those seeking a balance of performance and economy.
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong, predictable grip in both wet and dry conditions
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Good longevity for daily commuting and highway driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a lack of precision during aggressive cornering
- Performance significantly degrades in near-freezing or snowy conditions
- Occasional reports of sidewall bulges or premature wear under heavy use
- Not suitable for high-performance track applications
Observations
- Drivers of heavy vehicles or hot hatches noted that the soft sidewalls can cause a 'rolling' sensation during spirited cornering.
- Users on luxury sedans (e.g., Lexus, Audi) frequently highlighted the tire's ability to significantly reduce road noise and improve ride quality over stock premium tires.
- Some owners of high-torque vehicles reported faster tread wear on the front axle compared to lighter, standard passenger cars.
The Vredestein Quatrac 3 is widely regarded as a highly capable all-season tire that excels in adverse weather conditions, particularly snow, ice, and mud. While users consistently praise its winter performance and safety, the consensus is that it functions as a compromise, with some users reporting increased road noise as the tread wears and variable longevity depending on vehicle weight and driving style.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in snow, ice, and slushy conditions.
- Strong, predictable performance in wet and cold weather.
- Provides a reliable, safe alternative to dedicated winter tires for rural or unpredictable climates.
- Good value proposition compared to premium competitors.
Cons
- Significant increase in road noise and 'droning' as the tire wears past the 10,000-mile mark.
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting rapid wear on heavier vehicles or under high-load conditions.
- Noticeable compromise in dry-weather handling and steering sharpness compared to dedicated summer tires.
- Occasional reports of high-pitched noise or 'hissing' on damp road surfaces.
Observations
- Users with lighter vehicles (e.g., small hatchbacks) generally report better tread longevity and satisfaction compared to those with heavier estates or SUVs.
- The tire is frequently praised for transforming the comfort and road-holding of smaller vehicles, such as the Mazda MX5 or Ford Fiesta.
- Heavy-duty use, such as towing or driving on rough, twisty roads, significantly accelerates tread wear.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Fera SU4 | B · Vredestein Quatrac 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | All Season High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
84
/ 100
Nexen
82
/ 100
Vredestein
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better comfort, dry and treadwear. Pick the Vredestein Quatrac 3 if snow matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Vredestein Quatrac 3 scores 100 vs 76 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 88 vs 77 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 91 vs 81 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 82 vs 76 on treadwear.
Tire A · Nexen N Fera SU4
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac 3
More comparisons
Also compared with
Nexen N Fera SU4 also compared with
Vredestein Quatrac 3 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.