74
/ 100
Objective (60%)
53/100
6 professional tests
User signal (40%)
87/100
25 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Nexen N Fera Primus vs Nexen SB652 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
73/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen N Fera Primus — better wet, handling and treadwear. Pick the Nexen SB652 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
N Fera Primus leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | N Fera Primus | SB652 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 67 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 72 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
N Fera Primus leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | N Fera Primus | SB652 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 60 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
SB652 leads by 53
Why this score
| Source | N Fera Primus | SB652 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 1 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 88 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | N Fera Primus | SB652 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
N Fera Primus leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | N Fera Primus | SB652 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 78 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
N Fera Primus leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | N Fera Primus | SB652 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 67 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Fera Primus | Nexen SB652 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 72 |
| Dry | 76 | 72 |
| Wet | 84 | 60 |
| Snow | 76 | – |
| Comfort | 35 | 88 |
| Noise | 85 | – |
| Treadwear | 85 | 78 |
| Handling | 77 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
74
/ 100
Tire A
72
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Nexen N Fera Primus is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that offers impressive wet and dry traction, often rivaling more expensive premium brands. While most users praise its comfort, quiet ride, and affordability, it is strictly a summer-oriented tire that performs poorly in freezing or wintry conditions.
Pros
- Excellent value for the price point
- Strong wet and dry surface traction
- High levels of ride comfort and noise suppression
- Predictable handling and stability in spirited driving
Cons
- Poor performance and lack of traction in snow or freezing temperatures
- Potential for rapid tread wear
- Inconsistent reports regarding road noise levels
- Long-term durability concerns, such as sidewall cracking after several years
Observations
- Users with lightweight vehicles noted that XL (Extra Load) rated tires can feel overly stiff, increasing sensitivity to road imperfections.
- Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., Focus RS) reported that the tire provides competitive grip levels compared to premium alternatives like the Michelin Pilot Super Sport.
The Nexen SB652 is widely regarded as a budget-friendly, comfort-oriented tire that offers predictable handling for daily driving. While users appreciate its affordability and ride quality, performance enthusiasts and those prioritizing wet-weather grip may find its capabilities modest compared to premium alternatives.
Pros
- Excellent value for money and low purchase price
- High level of ride comfort and compliance
- Predictable handling and feedback during spirited driving
- Improved dry braking performance compared to entry-level stock tires
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, ranging from rapid wear under hard use to decent longevity on lighter vehicles
- Modest grip levels in wet conditions
- Not suitable for high-performance driving demands
- Aesthetic design is often described as unremarkable
Observations
- Owners of smaller, lighter vehicles like the Ford KA report a comfortable, 'floaty' ride quality.
- Drivers of vehicles without power steering or ABS appreciate the detailed feedback and predictable nature of the tire when approaching traction limits.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Fera Primus | B · Nexen SB652 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
74
/ 100
Nexen
72
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Nexen N Fera Primus — better wet, handling and treadwear. Pick the Nexen SB652 if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen SB652 scores 88 vs 35 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N Fera Primus scores 84 vs 60 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen N Fera Primus scores 77 vs 67 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Nexen N Fera Primus scores 85 vs 78 on treadwear.
Tire A · Nexen N Fera Primus
Tire B · Nexen SB652
More comparisons
Also compared with
Nexen N Fera Primus also compared with
Nexen SB652 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.