72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
73/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Nexen SB652 vs Vredestein Sprint Classic — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
72/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
76/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Vredestein Sprint Classic — better wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Sprint Classic leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | SB652 | Sprint Classic |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Sprint Classic leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | SB652 | Sprint Classic |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 71 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | SB652 | Sprint Classic |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 88 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | SB652 | Sprint Classic |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 5 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
SB652 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | SB652 | Sprint Classic |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 76 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Sprint Classic leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | SB652 | Sprint Classic |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 69 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen SB652 | Vredestein Sprint Classic |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 79 |
| Dry | 72 | 84 |
| Wet | 60 | 78 |
| Comfort | 88 | 88 |
| Noise | – | 5 |
| Treadwear | 78 | 76 |
| Handling | 67 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Nexen SB652 is widely regarded as a budget-friendly, comfort-oriented tire that offers predictable handling for daily driving. While users appreciate its affordability and ride quality, performance enthusiasts and those prioritizing wet-weather grip may find its capabilities modest compared to premium alternatives.
Pros
- Excellent value for money and low purchase price
- High level of ride comfort and compliance
- Predictable handling and feedback during spirited driving
- Improved dry braking performance compared to entry-level stock tires
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, ranging from rapid wear under hard use to decent longevity on lighter vehicles
- Modest grip levels in wet conditions
- Not suitable for high-performance driving demands
- Aesthetic design is often described as unremarkable
Observations
- Owners of smaller, lighter vehicles like the Ford KA report a comfortable, 'floaty' ride quality.
- Drivers of vehicles without power steering or ABS appreciate the detailed feedback and predictable nature of the tire when approaching traction limits.
The Vredestein Sprint Classic is widely regarded as a high-value, aesthetically authentic tire for classic vehicle enthusiasts, offering a compelling balance of period-correct looks and modern radial performance. While most users praise its dry-weather grip and comfort, there is a recurring concern regarding premature sidewall cracking, even in low-mileage, garaged conditions.
Pros
- Excellent period-correct aesthetic for classic cars
- High value-for-money compared to premium vintage-spec alternatives
- Strong dry-weather handling and cornering performance
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Reports of premature sidewall cracking on the inner tire wall
- Vague steering feedback due to high-profile sidewall construction
- Subpar performance in wet conditions and at the limit for spirited driving
- Sensitivity to tire pressure adjustments
Observations
- Owners of classic British sports cars like the Triumph TR6 and Jaguar E-Type report high satisfaction with the tire's handling characteristics.
- Users note that the high-profile sidewalls require careful experimentation with tire pressures to optimize handling and stability.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen SB652 | B · Vredestein Sprint Classic |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Nexen
79
/ 100
Vredestein
Winner: Vredestein Sprint Classic — better wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Vredestein Sprint Classic scores 78 vs 60 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Vredestein Sprint Classic scores 84 vs 72 on dry.
Tire A · Nexen SB652
Tire B · Vredestein Sprint Classic
More comparisons
Also compared with
Nexen SB652 also compared with
Vredestein Sprint Classic also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.