Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Nitto Invo vs Riken All Star 2 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Nitto

Nitto Invo

Summer High Performance tires

Nitto Invo tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
19 owner reviews
Dry
79
Wet
67
Comfort
67
Treadwear
65
Handling
75

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Riken

Riken All Star 2

Summer Touring tires

Riken All Star 2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
57/100
3 owner reviews
Dry
73
Wet
57
Comfort
67
Treadwear
37
Handling
60

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Nitto Invo — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

5 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Invo leads by 6
A — Nitto Invo
79
B — Riken All Star 2
73
Why this score
SourceInvoAll Star 2
Tyre Reviews owners 79 73
SimpleTire owners 98 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Invo leads by 10
A — Nitto Invo
67
B — Riken All Star 2
57
Why this score
SourceInvoAll Star 2
Tyre Reviews owners 67 57
SimpleTire owners 87 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Nitto Invo
67
B — Riken All Star 2
67
Why this score
SourceInvoAll Star 2
Tyre Reviews owners 67 67
SimpleTire owners 98 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Invo leads by 28
A — Nitto Invo
65
B — Riken All Star 2
37
Why this score
SourceInvoAll Star 2
Tyre Reviews owners 65 37
SimpleTire owners 84 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Invo leads by 15
A — Nitto Invo
75
B — Riken All Star 2
60
Why this score
SourceInvoAll Star 2
Tyre Reviews owners 75 60

Scores at a glance

Nitto Invo vs Riken All Star 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNitto InvoRiken All Star 2
Relative Score 70 56
Dry 79 73
Wet 67 57
Comfort 67 67
Treadwear 65 37
Handling 75 60

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Nitto Invo

The Nitto Invo is a polarizing ultra-high-performance tire that receives highly inconsistent feedback regarding its longevity and noise levels. While some users praise its dry-weather grip and aesthetic appeal, a significant portion of owners report premature hardening, excessive road noise, and a notable decline in wet-weather performance as the tread wears down.

Pros

  • Strong dry-weather traction and cornering stability
  • Attractive, aggressive tread pattern design
  • Competitive price point compared to premium rivals
  • Good initial comfort levels when new

Cons

  • Significant increase in road noise and 'whine' as the tire ages
  • Substantial decline in wet-weather grip and safety over time
  • Tendency to pick up and retain small road debris in the tread grooves
  • Inconsistent tread life with reports of premature hardening and structural issues

Observations

  • Users on FWD platforms like the Mazda3 noted rapid front-tire wear, suggesting a need for frequent rotation.
  • High-horsepower vehicles (e.g., Chrysler SRT8, Holden Commodore) report difficulty maintaining traction under heavy acceleration.
  • Drivers on rougher road surfaces report higher instances of sidewall damage and structural failure compared to those on well-maintained highways.
Tire B Riken All Star 2

The Riken All Star 2 is viewed as a polarizing budget-tier tire that serves as a temporary solution rather than a long-term investment. While some users appreciate its value proposition for light-duty city driving, others report significant concerns regarding premature wear and overall durability compared to premium alternatives.

Pros

  • Attractive low price point
  • Acceptable noise levels for budget-conscious drivers
  • Adequate stopping performance in light city conditions

Cons

  • Poor tread longevity and durability
  • Failure to meet safety inspection standards within a year
  • Inconsistent quality compared to premium tire brands

Observations

  • Users operating smaller, lighter vehicles like the Daewoo Matiz reported acceptable noise levels and curb-climbing capability.
  • The tire is frequently criticized when used as a direct replacement for higher-end performance tires, highlighting a significant gap in material longevity.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nitto Invo B · Riken All Star 2
CategorySummer High Performance tiresSummer Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available39—
Rim diameters17″ – 22″—
Tread depth10.3/32″—
UTQG220 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Nitto

Riken

Winner: Nitto Invo — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Nitto Invo scores 65 vs 37 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nitto Invo scores 75 vs 60 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nitto Invo scores 67 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Nitto Invo scores 79 vs 73 on dry.

Tire A · Nitto Invo
Tire B · Riken All Star 2

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.