78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
33 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1 vs Yokohama Advan A050 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
61
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1 — better treadwear, wet and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Advan A050 if handling and dry matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Advan A050 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | CINTURA/TO P1 | Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 97 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
CINTURA/TO P1 leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | CINTURA/TO P1 | Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 48 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
CINTURA/TO P1 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | CINTURA/TO P1 | Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 64 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
CINTURA/TO P1 leads by 45
Why this score
| Source | CINTURA/TO P1 | Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 35 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Advan A050 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | CINTURA/TO P1 | Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 92 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1 | Yokohama Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 61 |
| Dry | 81 | 97 |
| Wet | 73 | 48 |
| Comfort | 83 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 35 |
| Handling | 73 | 92 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
61
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Pirelli Cinturato P1 is widely regarded as a reliable, comfort-oriented touring tire that excels in daily commuting and long-distance driving. While many users praise its exceptional tread life and bump absorption, performance consistency appears to decline significantly as the tread wears down, leading to mixed reports regarding wet-weather safety and handling at the end of the tire's lifecycle.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and high mileage capability
- Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
- Low road noise levels
- Improved fuel efficiency
- Strong value proposition for daily driving
Cons
- Noticeable decline in grip and handling as tread depth decreases
- Reports of sidewall bulges and structural fragility
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance compared to premium sport tires
- Hardening of the rubber compound over time
Observations
- Users with high-torque or performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., GTI, high-output turbo models) frequently report that the tire lacks the dynamic handling and grip required for spirited driving.
- Drivers of economy and mid-sized sedans (e.g., Kia Cerato, Skoda Octavia) report the highest satisfaction, specifically citing the tire's suitability for long-distance highway cruising.
The Yokohama Advan A050 is widely regarded as a premier R-spec semi-slick tire, offering class-leading dry grip and exceptional handling feedback for time attack and track-focused enthusiasts. While users praise its consistent performance and predictable nature, they acknowledge that its high cost and rapid tread wear necessitate a dedicated use case, as it is not optimized for wet conditions or daily commuting.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
- Predictable and communicative handling characteristics
- Consistent grip levels maintained throughout the tire's life
- Rapid warm-up time providing confidence from cold
Cons
- Very high price point compared to competitors
- Rapid tread wear, particularly in softer compounds
- Poor performance and safety risks in wet or cold conditions
- Compound-dependent performance variability
Observations
- Users noted that the tire's performance is highly dependent on suspension tuning, as the extreme grip levels can overwhelm poorly set-up vehicles.
- Front-wheel drive users reported significantly faster wear on front tires compared to the rear, with an estimated lifespan of 5,000 km to 7,000 km.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1 | B · Yokohama Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Pirelli
61
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1 — better treadwear, wet and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Advan A050 if handling and dry matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1 scores 80 vs 35 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1 scores 73 vs 48 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1 scores 83 vs 64 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama Advan A050 scores 92 vs 73 on handling.
Tire A · Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1
Tire B · Yokohama Advan A050
More comparisons
Also compared with
Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1 also compared with
Yokohama Advan A050 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.