Skip to content
tirewheelguide.com
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Nexen CP641 vs Riken Raptor HR — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Nexen

Nexen CP641

All Season Touring tires

Nexen CP641 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
67/100
33 owner reviews
Dry
75
Wet
59
Snow
–
Comfort
70
Noise
–
Treadwear
76
Handling
67
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Riken

Riken Raptor HR

Grand Touring All-Season

Riken Raptor HR tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
87/100
Owner ratings
Dry
90
Wet
79
Snow
61
Comfort
90
Noise
89
Treadwear
87
Handling
91
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Riken Raptor HR — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Raptor HR leads by 15
A
75
B
90
Why this score
SourceCP641Raptor HR
Tire Rack owners – 90
Tyre Reviews owners 75 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Raptor HR leads by 20
A
59
B
79
Why this score
SourceCP641Raptor HR
Tire Rack owners – 84
Tyre Reviews owners 59 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
–
B
61
Why this score
SourceCP641Raptor HR
Tire Rack owners – 72

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Raptor HR leads by 20
A
70
B
90
Why this score
SourceCP641Raptor HR
Tire Rack owners – 86
Tyre Reviews owners 70 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
–
B
89

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Raptor HR leads by 11
A
76
B
87
Why this score
SourceCP641Raptor HR
Tire Rack owners – 86
Tyre Reviews owners 76 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Raptor HR leads by 24
A
67
B
91
Why this score
SourceCP641Raptor HR
Tyre Reviews owners 67 –

Scores at a glance

CategoryNexen CP641Riken Raptor HR
Relative Score 69 86
Dry 75 90
Wet 59 79
Snow – 61
Comfort 70 90
Noise – 89
Treadwear 76 87
Handling 67 91

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Nexen CP641

The Nexen CP641 is a polarizing budget-tier tire that receives mixed reviews, primarily praised for its exceptional tread longevity and value-for-money proposition. While many users appreciate its dry-weather comfort and quiet ride, a significant portion of the user base reports poor wet-weather performance, including hydroplaning and a lack of steering confidence.

Pros

  • Excellent tread life and durability
  • High value for money compared to premium brands
  • Generally comfortable ride quality
  • Good dry-weather traction

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather grip and braking performance
  • High levels of road noise reported by many users
  • Inconsistent quality control, including reports of sidewall cracking and belt separation
  • Lack of steering feedback and confidence during aggressive maneuvers

Observations

  • Users with heavier or performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., Celica GT-Four, Turbo Rover) noted a lack of confidence and 'twitchy' handling at the limit.
  • Drivers of family vehicles like the Nissan Qashqai and Renault Scenic reported higher satisfaction regarding comfort and noise levels compared to those with sportier setups.
  • The tire is directional, which some users noted as a limitation for rotation patterns.
Tire B Riken Raptor HR

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen CP641 B · Riken Raptor HR
CategoryAll Season Touring tiresGrand Touring All-Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen

Riken

Winner: Riken Raptor HR — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Riken Raptor HR scores 91 vs 67 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Riken Raptor HR scores 79 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Riken Raptor HR scores 90 vs 70 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Riken Raptor HR scores 90 vs 75 on dry.

Tire A · Nexen CP641
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Riken Raptor HR
Check price on Amazon

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.